Carbon Nanostructure Layers Parallel Alignment

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional carbon nanotube mats face issues such as low bulk density, random alignment of carbon nanotubes, stiffness, and environmental health concerns due to small size, which hinder their effective application in various fields.

Innovation Solution

Carbon nanostructures are developed that are agglomerated, branched, crosslinked, and share common walls, allowing for parallel alignment and higher bulk density, which can be easily handled and processed without surfactants, enhancing their mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If individual carbon nanotubes are used, then unique chemical, mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties are achieved, but poor solvent solubility, limited dispersibility, and strong van der Waals forces cause bundling and ropes

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the carbon nanotube structure by introducing deliberate defects, vacancies, and functional groups at specific locations along the nanotube length, creating distinct segments with different properties that improve dispersibility while maintaining overall structural integrity and desirable properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies local quality by creating non-uniform structures where specific regions of the carbon nanotube have modified properties (defects, functional groups, varying diameters) while other regions maintain the pristine structure, allowing simultaneous optimization of dispersibility and property expression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If carbon nanotube mats are formed by filtration, then a freestanding layer is produced, but low bulk density (less than 0.4 g/cm³) results and carbon nanotubes remain randomly aligned

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary action by pre-aligning carbon nanotubes in a desired orientation before mat formation through controlled deposition processes, and pre-modifying nanotube surfaces with functional groups that promote denser packing, thereby achieving both ease of manufacture and improved bulk density

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If carbon nanotubes are randomly aligned in mats, then filtration production is simple, but the beneficial property enhancements are negated and the structure becomes rigid

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces dynamics by creating controllable alignment mechanisms that allow the carbon nanotube mat structure to adapt its orientation during formation, enabling transition from random to aligned configurations without sacrificing production throughput, thereby maintaining both productivity and property enhancement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If surfactants are used to produce individualized carbon nanotubes, then dispersion is improved, but surfactants are difficult to completely eliminate and beneficial properties are eroded

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses functional groups and surface modifications as intermediaries that perform the dispersion function traditionally provided by surfactants, but without the contamination issues, allowing complete elimination of external surfactants while maintaining improved dispersion and property expression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The carbon nanostructure mats exhibit improved density, flexibility, and environmental safety, enabling better property expression and commercial viability compared to individual carbon nanotubes, with increased thickness and directional properties.

Implementation Method 1

it is believed that many of these issues can arise due to the strong van der Waals forces that occur between individual carbon nanotubes, thereby causing them to group into bundles or ropes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVan der Waals forces: Van der Waals Force

Data Source

PatentUS9133031B2Carbon nanostructure layers and methods for making the same
Publication Date: 2015.09.15
  • US9133031B2 patent drawing
  • US9133031B2 patent drawing
  • US9133031B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A carbon nanostructure that is free of a growth substrate adhered to the carbon nanostructure can include a plurality of carbon nanotubes that are branched, crosslinked, and share common walls with one another. Carbon nanostructures can be agglomerated with one another and densified to form a carbon nanostructure layer in which at least a portion of the carbon nanotubes in each carbon nanostructure are aligned substantially parallel to one another. Methods for forming a carbon nanostructure layer can include providing a plurality of carbon nanostructures that are free of a growth substrate adhered to each carbon nanostructure, and forming a carbon nanostructure layer by depositing the carbon nanostructures on a surface.