Carbon Neutralization Routing in Communication Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current carbon offsetting mechanisms in communication networks are inadequate for effectively reducing carbon emissions, necessitating a direct approach to minimize emissions at the source to combat climate change.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for carbon neutralization in communication networks that involve receiving service tasks from user equipment, obtaining carbon neutralization calculation parameters, selecting optimal entities for task execution based on green power and KPI parameters, and routing tasks to minimize carbon footprint and optimize resource distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If carbon offsetting mechanisms are used to compensate for emissions, then carbon neutrality can be achieved, but overall carbon emissions are not effectively reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon emissionsVSAvoidemission reduction effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of allowing tasks to be executed anywhere and then offsetting emissions, the patent inverts the approach by first evaluating carbon emission metrics and then routing tasks to locations with lowest emissions. The carbon neutralization calculation module computes emission metrics and the routing module uses these metrics to select optimal target entities, thereby reducing emissions at the source rather than compensating afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The communication network performs self-service carbon neutralization by autonomously evaluating carbon emission metrics and routing tasks to minimize its own carbon footprint. The system uses its own resources (computing power, network infrastructure) to calculate emission metrics and make routing decisions, eliminating the need for external carbon offsetting mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Object-affected harmful factors

If service tasks are routed based on carbon neutralization parameters, then carbon footprint is reduced, but task execution may be constrained to specific entities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon footprintVSAvoidtask routing flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The routing decision is made dynamic by continuously evaluating carbon neutralization calculation parameters and adapting task allocation accordingly. The system can dynamically adjust which target entities receive tasks based on real-time or near-real-time carbon emission metrics, allowing flexibility to change routing decisions as conditions change while maintaining adaptability through multiple candidate targets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the routing parameter from traditional metrics (load balancing, response time) to include carbon neutralization calculation parameters. By introducing emission metrics as a new dimension for routing decisions, the system achieves carbon footprint reduction while maintaining routing flexibility through multi-parameter optimization rather than single-metric constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple candidate targets are evaluated for carbon metrics, then emission optimization is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon emissionsVSAvoidrouting decision complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the carbon neutralization process into distinct functional modules: a carbon neutralization calculation module that computes emission metrics, and a routing module that uses these metrics for decision-making. This segmentation allows complex carbon evaluation to be handled separately from task routing logic, reducing overall system complexity while enabling comprehensive carbon optimization across multiple candidate targets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20230336418A1Carbon neutralization handling in a communication network
Publication Date: 2023.10.19 MEDIATEK INC
  • US20230336418A1 patent drawing
  • US20230336418A1 patent drawing
  • US20230336418A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of for performing carbon neutralization in a communication network is provided. The method includes receiving a service task from a user equipment. The method also includes obtaining a carbon neutralization calculation parameter related to performing the received service task. The method further includes selecting, based on the obtained carbon neutralization calculation parameter, a target entity from a plurality of candidate targets at which the received service task can be performed. The method further includes sending the received service task to the selected target entity.