Carbon-Sequestering Cladding for Infrastructure

Solution Overview

Problem

Current construction materials and methods fail to effectively reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the atmosphere, particularly in load-bearing structural elements, due to limitations in compressive strength and widespread acceptance of low-carbon alternatives.

Innovation Solution

The development of carbon-sequestering cladding members that can be integrated into or added to infrastructure structures, using materials like low-embodied carbon concrete and bio-organisms, which can capture and store carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and are designed to be removable and replaceable to maintain structural integrity and carbon sequestration capacity over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If conventional construction materials are used, then structural strength is maintained, but carbon dioxide emissions are not reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The infrastructure element is divided into two functional parts: a structural member that provides load-bearing capacity and a separate carbon-sequestering cladding that captures CO2. This segmentation allows each component to optimize its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite construction combining conventional structural materials (concrete, steel) with carbon-sequestering materials (bio-organisms, porous materials). This composite approach enables the structure to simultaneously achieve structural integrity and carbon capture functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-generated harmful factors

If low-carbon materials with bio-organisms are used, then carbon sequestration is improved, but compressive strength decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The cladding is designed as a separate non-load-bearing element that can be applied to the structural member. This allows the use of materials optimized for carbon sequestration without requiring them to bear structural loads, thus avoiding the compressive strength problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the infrastructure element have different material properties: the structural member uses high-strength materials for load-bearing, while the cladding uses carbon-sequestering materials for CO2 capture. Each part's material properties are locally optimized for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If carbon-sequestering cladding is permanently incorporated, then structural integrity is maintained, but carbon sequestration capacity diminishes over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The cladding is designed to be removable and replaceable rather than permanently fixed. This dynamic approach allows the carbon-sequestering component to be renewed periodically, restoring its CO2 capture capacity while the permanent structural member maintains structural integrity throughout the infrastructure's life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cladding is treated as a consumable component that can be removed after its carbon sequestration capacity is depleted and replaced with fresh cladding. This allows continuous restoration of carbon capture functionality without affecting the long-term structural integrity of the infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Object-generated harmful factors

If removable cladding is used, then carbon sequestration capacity can be renewed, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the cladding from the structural member, the design simplifies the removal and replacement process. The standardized interface between cladding and structural element reduces construction complexity compared to integrated designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cladding design incorporates multiple functions: carbon sequestration, potential aesthetic value, and protective coverage. This multi-functionality justifies the additional complexity by delivering multiple benefits from a single component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the reduction of carbon emissions from construction and infrastructure, allowing for the creation of zero-carbon or carbon-negative infrastructure by continuously renewing the carbon sequestration capacity of the cladding members, while ensuring the structural soundness of the infrastructure elements.

Implementation Method 1

carbon-sequestering cladding members capable of capturing and sequestering carbon from carbon dioxide in atmospheric/ambient air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCarbon sequestration: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS20240392579A1Carbon sequestering infrastructure
Publication Date: 2024.11.28
  • US20240392579A1 patent drawing
  • US20240392579A1 patent drawing
  • US20240392579A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Carbon sequestering infrastructure incorporates carbon-sequestering cladding members that are separate and distinct from structural elements configured to carry a structural load of the infrastructure. The cladding is capable of capturing and sequestering carbon from carbon dioxide in atmospheric/ambient air. The cladding may be distinct members having a high carbon capture capacity (but a low compressive strength unsuitable for use in a structural member) attached to structural members having a lower carbon capture capacity (and a higher compressive strength suitable for use in a structural member). The cladding member may be formed as an envelope suitable for use as a form in casting a structural member. Infrastructure elements including cladding may be configured such that the cladding is removable and replaceable after is carbon sequestering capacity is diminished, to allow for carbon sequestration over the entire length of the infrastructure.