Card Shuffler Dealing Rack Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanical card shufflers are often slow, large, prone to jamming, and unable to efficiently handle bent or sticking cards, making them unsuitable for casino use where quick and reliable shuffling of multiple decks is necessary.

Innovation Solution

A programmable computer-controlled mechanical shuffler with a dealing rack and deck-crib system that randomly places cards into receptacles, allowing for efficient shuffling and distribution of cards as complete decks or hands, capable of handling multiple decks and cards that may be bent or sticking together.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing mechanical card shufflers are used, then cards can be shuffled automatically, but they are slow and take too long to process multiple decks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshuffling speedVSAvoidtime to shuffle multiple decks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The shuffler divides the deck into multiple sections using a dealing rack with multiple receptacles. Cards are distributed one at a time to different receptacles in a systematic pattern, allowing parallel processing of multiple decks simultaneously. This segmentation enables the system to handle multiple decks without sequential delays, significantly improving throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-arranges the dealing rack with multiple receptacles positioned and ready before shuffling begins. The computer-controlled mechanism has pre-programmed the sequence of card distribution, allowing immediate processing of multiple decks without setup delays. The rack structure is pre-configured to accommodate the specific shuffling pattern required for efficient multi-deck processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Extent of automation

If existing mechanical card shufflers are used, then automatic shuffling is achieved, but they are large and impede view of the game table

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic card shufflingVSAvoidsize of shuffler
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The shuffler uses a dealing rack divided into multiple small receptacles rather than a single large processing chamber. This segmentation allows the automatic shuffling mechanism to be compact while maintaining full functionality. The distributed architecture of multiple small receptacles reduces the overall footprint compared to traditional single-chamber designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a horizontal spread-out layout to a vertical stacking arrangement of receptacles. By utilizing the vertical dimension, the shuffler achieves compact horizontal dimensions suitable for casino tables while maintaining adequate space for the computer-controlled card distribution mechanism to operate effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If existing mechanical card shufflers are used, then cards are shuffled, but they frequently jam when cards are bent or sticking together

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecard shuffling capabilityVSAvoidjamming frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The dealing rack segments the card flow into individual receptacles, allowing cards to be placed one at a time in isolated compartments. This prevents bent or sticking cards from blocking entire processing paths. Each receptacle acts as an independent chamber that can accommodate cards in various states without causing system-wide jams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The receptacles serve as intermediary chambers between the card source and the final dealt position. These intermediate compartments allow cards to be temporarily held and repositioned, providing buffer space that prevents immediate jamming when cards are bent or stuck. The intermediary receptacles enable the system to handle defective cards without stopping operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If existing mechanical card shufflers are used, then cards are shuffled sequentially, but they cannot efficiently present shuffled cards as complete decks or hands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshuffling efficiencyVSAvoidcard presentation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The dealing rack segments cards into individual receptacles that can be independently accessed. This segmentation enables the system to present cards in various configurations - complete decks by accessing all receptacles, or specific hands by selecting particular receptacles. The modular structure allows flexible card presentation without requiring complete reshuffling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The same dealing rack structure serves multiple functions: it shuffles cards, holds them in organized positions, and enables various presentation modes including complete deck delivery and hand-specific distribution. The computer-controlled mechanism can programmatically access different receptacle combinations to fulfill different operational requirements, eliminating the need for separate mechanisms for different presentation types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10933301B2Method for shuffling and dealing cards
Publication Date: 2021.03.02 LNW GAMING INC
  • US10933301B2 patent drawing
  • US10933301B2 patent drawing
  • US10933301B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A card shuffler that moves cards one at a time to randomly designated single-card receptacle in a receiving or dealing rack, and a method for shuffling and for dealing cards.