Cardboard Tray Plastic Lid Locking Mechanism
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing packaging arrangements with cardboard trays and plastic lids face challenges in achieving easy closure and opening while maintaining structural stability, particularly when the tray sides are thin and smooth.
Innovation Solution
A packaging arrangement with a cardboard tray and plastic lid featuring a locking mechanism that includes a groove with a guide joint, locking projection, and a locking tab, allowing for adjustable locking resistance and easy opening, while ensuring stability through a corrugated wall step and contraction structure.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Strength
If a locking mechanism with high locking resistance is used to maintain structural stability, then the load-bearing capacity is improved, but the ease of opening deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The locking mechanism is segmented into multiple independent locking tabs distributed around the tray perimeter, each providing localized locking resistance. This segmentation allows the total locking resistance to be distributed, maintaining overall stability while enabling controlled opening at specific points.
Solution Approach 2:
The locking mechanism incorporates dynamic elements including spring-loaded locking tabs that can be easily depressed to release the lock, and a flexible skirt flank that allows controlled deformation during opening. The guide joint also provides dynamic guidance during the opening transition.
2Ease of operation
If a simple closure mechanism is used for easy closing, then the ease of operation is improved, but the structural stability deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The locking tabs are pre-positioned and spring-loaded to automatically engage with the groove's locking projections when the lid is placed on the tray. The guide joint is pre-formed to guide the tray wall edge into the correct position, ensuring stable closure without requiring complex manual intervention.
Solution Approach 2:
The locking mechanism is designed to self-lock automatically when the lid is closed. The spring-loaded locking tabs naturally engage with the locking projections in the groove, and the corrugated wall step provides automatic mechanical interlocking, eliminating the need for additional fastening actions.
3Weight of moving object
If the tray wall is made thin and smooth to reduce material usage, then the weight is reduced, but the load-bearing capacity deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The tray wall is made thin and smooth overall to reduce weight, but locally reinforced at critical areas where the locking mechanism is positioned. The corrugated wall step and the areas around locking tab positions have enhanced structural properties to maintain load-bearing capacity despite the generally thin wall construction.
Solution Approach 2:
The locking mechanism combines different material properties and structural features: the thin smooth tray wall material is complemented by the corrugated wall step structure and the integrated locking tabs, creating a composite system that achieves high load-bearing capacity through the combination of these different structural elements rather than relying on thick walls alone.
Data Source
Figure 1~2
Figure 3
Figure 4
AI summary
Packaging arrangement comprising a receiving tray (1) with a tray wall (11), in particular made of cardboard, enclosing a tray wall edge (111 to 1114), a lid element (2), in particular made of plastic, with a groove (22) for at least partially receiving the tray wall edge (111 to 114), wherein the tray wall edge (111 to 114) includes a resisting edge (123 to 126) and a tray wall edge edge (127) which together form a support edge (117 to 120), wherein the groove (22) has a guide groove (232) and an inner flank (224) extending in the receiving tray (1) with a locking projection (229), wherein the resisting edge (123 to 126) faces the locking projection (229) and wherein the guide groove (232) and the support edge (117 to 120) have a length,which moves in a range between a dimensioned maximum distance between the locking projection (229) and the guide joint (232) and a dimensioned shortest distance between the locking projection (229) and the guide joint (232) such that the support edge (117 to 120) experiences a locking engagement with locking resistance between the locking projection (229) and the guide joint (232).