Image Quality Prediction for Cardiac CT Parameter Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical imaging techniques face challenges in optimizing image acquisition parameters to achieve high-quality images while minimizing radiation exposure and resource usage, particularly in diagnosing coronary artery disease, as existing methods rely on population-based or standard protocols that do not account for individual patient anatomy or specific imaging tasks.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that use historical data and machine learning techniques to identify optimal image acquisition parameters by processing patient characteristics, operator characteristics, and preliminary scans to predict image quality, allowing for personalized settings that balance image quality with radiation exposure and resource efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If population-based or standard protocols are used for image acquisition, then resource usage and radiation exposure are minimized through standardized procedures, but image quality may be compromised due to lack of individualization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidparameter optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of patient data (anatomy, physiology, clinical indication) before image acquisition to pre-determine optimal parameters. This preliminary action enables customization without increasing operational complexity during the actual imaging process, as the optimization is completed in advance through automated computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary computational system acts as a mediator between patient characteristics and acquisition parameters. This intermediary processes patient-specific data and translates it into optimized parameter sets, eliminating the need for complex manual optimization while enabling individualized imaging protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If high-quality images are acquired through optimized parameters, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but radiation exposure and resource usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidradiation exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes acquisition parameters (tube voltage, current, scan duration, reconstruction algorithms) based on patient-specific characteristics and clinical requirements. By optimizing the combination of parameters rather than simply increasing radiation dose, the system achieves high diagnostic accuracy while minimizing radiation exposure through precise parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic parameter adjustment where acquisition settings are adapted in real-time based on patient anatomy and imaging goals. This dynamic optimization allows the system to use lower radiation doses when patient characteristics permit, while automatically increasing parameters only when necessary for diagnostic quality, thus resolving the contradiction between image quality and radiation exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If individualized image acquisition parameters are determined, then image quality is improved for specific patient anatomy, but the complexity of parameter selection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimization precisionVSAvoidparameter selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service optimization by automatically analyzing patient data and selecting optimal parameters without requiring manual intervention from technologists or physicists. This automated self-optimization achieves high precision in parameter selection while eliminating the complexity burden from operators, as the system independently determines the best parameters based on embedded algorithms and training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual parameter selection (mechanical/human process) with automated computational algorithms. This substitution uses machine learning models and computational optimization to determine parameters, achieving high precision while reducing operational complexity, as computers can process patient data and select parameters faster and more consistently than human operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240047045A1Systems and methods for predicting image quality scores of images
Publication Date: 2024.02.08 HEARTFLOW INC
  • US20240047045A1 patent drawing
  • US20240047045A1 patent drawing
  • US20240047045A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for identifying image acquisition parameters. One method includes receiving a patient data set including one or more reconstructions, one or more preliminary scans or patient information, and one or more acquisition parameters; computing one or more patient characteristics based on one or both of one or more preliminary scans and the patient information; computing one or more image characteristics associated with the one or more reconstructions; grouping the patient data set with one or more other patient data sets using the one or more patient characteristics; and identifying one or more image acquisition parameters suitable for the patient data set using the one or more image characteristics, the grouping of the patient data set with one or more other patient data sets, or a combination thereof.