Cardiac Monitoring Interval Tracking for Multi-Modal Transmission Docketing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managing cardiac monitoring devices is complex due to varying transmission frequencies and patient care requirements, leading to a significant burden on clinics, with less than 30% of patients being monitored according to reimbursement guidelines, and resulting in inefficiencies and increased healthcare costs.

Innovation Solution

A medical device management platform with a monitoring interval tracker that associates transmission data with patient care modalities, calculates interval extensions, and generates docket reports to ensure timely date of service calculations, minimizing follow-up failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If clinics manually track and manage transmissions from multiple cardiac monitoring devices with different transmission frequencies, then each device can be monitored individually, but the complexity of managing transmissions increases significantly and compliance with monitoring guidelines decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with monitoring guidelinesVSAvoidcomplexity of managing transmissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the management of cardiac monitoring devices by creating separate tracking mechanisms for different device types (pacemakers, ICDs, implantable loop recorders) and their specific transmission frequencies. Each device type is assigned dedicated monitoring protocols and intervals, allowing clinics to manage complexity through structured segmentation while maintaining comprehensive compliance tracking for all devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The transmission management system is designed as a universal platform that can handle multiple device types with different transmission frequencies through a single integrated system. The system automatically adapts to various device requirements without needing separate manual tracking processes for each device type, reducing overall management complexity while maintaining reliability across all device modalities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If clinics increase the frequency of transmissions to ensure patient safety and timely detection of cardiac events, then patient outcomes improve, but the burden of retrieving, reviewing, and documenting device transmissions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient outcomesVSAvoidtime for retrieving, reviewing, and documenting transmissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated actions by pre-scheduling transmissions according to device-specific frequencies and patient care requirements. Transmissions are automatically retrieved and organized before clinical review, eliminating the need for manual scheduling and initial data gathering. This preliminary automation reduces the time burden on clinical staff while maintaining frequent monitoring for improved patient outcomes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor transmission status, device performance, and patient metrics. This feedback loop automatically triggers subsequent transmissions and alerts when clinical intervention is needed, reducing manual review burden while ensuring timely detection of cardiac events. The feedback system processes information automatically, allowing frequent monitoring without proportionally increasing documentation time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If a single cardiac monitoring device is used for multiple types of patient care (remote monitoring and heart failure monitoring), then device utilization efficiency improves, but tracking every transmission and generating docketing reports becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice utilization efficiencyVSAvoidtracking and docketing report generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to universally handle multiple patient care modalities through a single integrated tracking mechanism. When a device serves multiple functions (remote monitoring and heart failure monitoring), the system automatically recognizes and tracks transmissions according to each modality's specific requirements without requiring separate tracking systems. This universal approach maintains high device utilization while managing tracking complexity through automated multi-modal recognition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments transmission tracking by patient care modality, automatically categorizing each transmission according to its intended use (remote monitoring, heart failure monitoring, or both). This segmentation allows the system to apply appropriate docketing rules and reporting requirements for each modality independently, simplifying the overall tracking process despite the device's multi-functional use. Each segmented transmission stream is managed according to its specific protocol

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If clinics reduce monitoring frequency to decrease operational burden, then management complexity decreases, but patient care quality and compliance with reimbursement guidelines deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanagement burdenVSAvoidpatient care quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated tracking and organization of transmissions according to optimal monitoring frequencies and reimbursement guidelines. By pre-processing and structuring data before clinical review, the system reduces the operational burden on staff while maintaining appropriate monitoring frequency. This preliminary automation makes it easier to operate the system without compromising patient care quality or compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250352117A1Systems and methods for managing a cardiac monitoring device with a monitoring interval tracker
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 MURJ INC
  • US20250352117A1 patent drawing
  • US20250352117A1 patent drawing
  • US20250352117A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods include a monitoring interval tracker for managing transmission data originating from the cardiac monitoring device. The monitoring interval tracker generates monitoring intervals corresponding to multiple, different patient care modalities (e.g., an in-office care modality, a remote monitoring care modality, and/or a heart failure care modality). Upon receiving transmission data, a docket report corresponding to the transmission data, and/or an approval of the docket report, the monitoring interval tracker determines whether to extend the monitoring interval, generate a date of service, and/or create a new monitoring interval. Multiple monitoring intervals may run concurrently to track transmission data, docket reports, and approval timestamps for the multiple, different patient care modalities. Results of the monitoring interval tracker may be outputted as an interactive monitoring interval visualizer and/or a transmission dashboard to improve patient care by preventing failures to follow up with patients and by improving billing accuracy and efficiency.