Cardiac Resynchronization Device Optimizing AV and VV Delays
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices face challenges in efficiently optimizing atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays due to the complexity and time-consuming nature of existing assessment methods, which often require multiple tests and echocardiographic procedures, leading to suboptimal results for approximately 30% of patients.
Innovation Solution
The technique involves analyzing endocardial acceleration (EA) signals during a single cardiac cycle to optimize AV and VV delays by combining temporal and non-temporal parameters, specifically optimizing the moment of onset for the EA4 component and the magnitude of the EA1 component, allowing for simultaneous and precise adjustment of these delays to maximize stroke volume and hemodynamic efficiency.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If echocardiographic assessment is used to optimize AV and VV delays, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time and device complexity increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces the mechanical echocardiographic assessment system with an electrical signal-based optimization system. The device uses intracardiac electrogram signals and endocardial acceleration signals to automatically determine optimal AV and VV delays, eliminating the need for external echocardiographic equipment and manual assessment procedures.
Solution Approach 2:
The optimization system is integrated directly into the CRT device, allowing it to perform self-optimization without external intervention. The device automatically analyzes intracardiac signals, processes the data, and adjusts pacing parameters autonomously, making the system self-sufficient for parameter optimization.
2Measurement precision
If multiple tests and echocardiographic procedures are performed to optimize delays, then optimization precision is improved, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines multiple assessment functions into a single integrated system. The device simultaneously analyzes intracardiac electrograms, endocardial acceleration signals, and ventricular contraction timing to determine optimal delays, merging what would otherwise require separate tests into one unified automated process.
Solution Approach 2:
The CRT device is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as a pacemaker and as an optimization system. The same device that delivers cardiac resynchronization therapy also performs the optimization assessment and adjustment, eliminating the need for separate optimization procedures and equipment.
3Ease of operation
If traditional stimulation is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but productivity and treatment effectiveness deteriorate for 30% of patients
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces dynamic adaptation to the otherwise static traditional stimulation approach. The device automatically adjusts pacing parameters based on real-time analysis of intracardiac signals and endocardial acceleration, enabling it to adapt to individual patient characteristics and physiological variations without requiring manual reprogramming.
Solution Approach 2:
The system automatically optimizes critical pacing parameters including AV delay and VV delay by analyzing physiological signals. By dynamically changing these parameters based on measured endocardial acceleration and electrogram characteristics, the system improves treatment effectiveness while maintaining ease of operation through automation.
Data Source
AI summary
An active implantable medical device for cardiac resynchronization with automatic optimization of atrioventricular and interventricular delays is disclosed. The device collects an endocardial acceleration signal EA and calculates the atrioventricular delay AVD and the interventricular delay VVD. The device isolate in the EA signal a component EA4 corresponding to the fourth EA peak and measure a temporal parameter related to a time interval between the detection of an atrial event (P/A) and the occurrence of the EA4 component. The device isolates an EA1 component corresponding to the first EA peak and measures a non-temporal parameter (APEA1) related to the peak amplitude or a signal energy of the EA1 component. The optimal AVD (AVDO) is determined by the temporal parameter related to the EA4 component, and is calculated for a plurality of different values of VVD to obtain a plurality of pairs of optimal values {AVDO, VVD}. The device selects one of these pairs of values based on the non-temporal parameter related to the EA1 component.


