Automatic Cardiac Timing Synchronization for MRI Motion Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern imaging methods, such as MRI, are sensitive to motion artifacts from heart beating and respiratory movements, leading to compromised image quality and non-diagnostic results in cardiac imaging, as existing methods lack precise motion control and are operator-dependent.

Innovation Solution

An MR imaging system automatically determines patient-specific, orientation-dependent cardiac timing parameters to synchronize image acquisition with minimal motion artifacts, using a 4D volume for scan planning and field-of-view determination, and a repository of data to identify optimal acquisition points within the heart cycle for consistent image quality across different heart orientations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ECG-based synchronization is used for cardiac imaging, then cardiac phase consistency is improved, but operator dependence and inability to optimize for different orientations remain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecardiac phase consistencyVSAvoidoperator independence
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically determining optimal trigger times for different cardiac orientations using stored reference data and algorithms, eliminating the need for operator intervention in timing parameter selection while maintaining reliable cardiac phase synchronization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of trigger time based on the specific cardiac orientation being imaged by automatically selecting from pre-stored optimal timing data corresponding to different orientations, thereby achieving both reliability and operator independence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If fast gradient switching is used to increase imaging speed, then imaging throughput is improved, but motion artifacts remain significant compared to voxel size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging throughputVSAvoidimage quality relative to motion
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-determining and storing optimal trigger times for various cardiac orientations before actual imaging, allowing fast gradient switching to be combined with precise motion control during the actual scan without compromising image quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies dynamics by making the trigger time parameter adaptive to the specific cardiac orientation being imaged, automatically adjusting the timing parameters to match the optimal values for each orientation while maintaining fast imaging speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual selection of trigger time is used, then flexibility in timing adjustment is improved, but consistency and reproducibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming adjustment flexibilityVSAvoidimage quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by using stored reference data from previous scans to automatically determine optimal trigger times for subsequent scans of the same orientation, ensuring consistent and reproducible timing parameters while maintaining the flexibility to adapt to different cardiac orientations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves universality by creating a comprehensive database of optimal trigger times that covers multiple cardiac orientations and imaging scenarios, allowing a single automated system to handle diverse imaging requirements with consistent results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9207300B2Automatic system for timing in imaging
Publication Date: 2015.12.08 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US9207300B2 patent drawing
  • US9207300B2 patent drawing
  • US9207300B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An imaging system automatically determines a cardiac timing parameter for acquiring a cardiac image in a heart phase. An interface receives data identifying a heart image orientation for image acquisition. A repository of data associates, for acquisition of an image in a particular heart phase, different image orientations with corresponding different data items identifying respective corresponding particular acquisition points within an individual heart cycle relative to a start point of the heart cycle. An acquisition timing processor determines from the repository of data, a particular acquisition point within an individual heart cycle relative to the start point of the heart cycle, in response to the received data identifying the heart image orientation and uses the determined particular acquisition point to provide a synchronization signal for triggering acquisition of an image at the particular heart phase.