Cargo Bike Child Seat Mounting Bracket with Height Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing child seat fastening systems in cargo bicycle containers are inadequate, leading to potential loosening during accidents, especially for small children, due to insufficient attachment security.

Innovation Solution

A child seat holding device with a main holding element attached to the cargo bike container's inner wall, utilizing webbing straps and a height-adjustable connecting element, along with an additional holding element for secure and adjustable attachment, ensuring reliable and safe positioning of child seats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If child seats are secured using simple attachment methods in cargo bike containers, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of attachment deteriorates, leading to potential loosening during accidents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment securityVSAvoidfastening system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fastening system is divided into separate functional components: a holding element attached to the cargo bike container, a connecting element with adjustment mechanism, and a support element connected to the child seat. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall reliability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connecting element acts as an intermediary between the holding element and the support element, providing a reliable mechanical connection that distributes forces effectively. This intermediary component ensures secure attachment while maintaining adjustability, resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the child seat position is fixed, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability deteriorates, preventing height adjustment for different children or preferences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheight adjustment capabilityVSAvoidadjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The connecting element incorporates a dynamic adjustment mechanism that allows the position of the support element relative to the holding element to be changed. This dynamic feature enables height adjustment for different children or preferences while maintaining a relatively simple structure through movable connections rather than complex mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If the holding element is attached directly to the cargo bike container walls, then the device complexity is reduced, but the strength of attachment deteriorates, insufficient for accident forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment strengthVSAvoidattachment structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment system uses composite construction combining rigid metal connecting brackets with flexible webbing straps. The metal brackets provide strong attachment points on the cargo bike container, while the flexible straps accommodate positioning adjustments. This composite approach achieves high attachment strength without requiring an overly complex rigid structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The connecting element serves as an intermediary that bridges the holding element and support element with multiple attachment points. This intermediary structure distributes forces across multiple connection points, enhancing overall attachment strength while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If shock forces are transmitted directly to the child seat, then the device complexity is reduced, but the harmful factors increase, causing direct shock transmission to the child

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock transmission to childVSAvoidshock absorption structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The connecting element and support element configuration provides beforehand cushioning by creating a distributed force transmission path. The webbing straps and connecting brackets act as cushioning elements that absorb and distribute shock forces before they reach the child seat, protecting the child from direct shock transmission without requiring a complex active shock absorption system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentEP4108542B1Child seat retention device
Publication Date: 2024.07.31 RTI SPORTS VERTRIEB VON SPORTARTIKELN GMBH
  • EP4108542B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4108542B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4108542B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A child seat mounting device for a cargo bike container (50) comprises a main mounting element (62) and, optionally, an additional mounting element (64). The child seat (60) is held by a support element that includes two support straps (96). The support element (96) is connected to the main mounting element (62) via a connecting element (90). This connecting element is height-adjustable to change the position of the child seat (60).