Adjustable Cargo Deck Structure With Vertical Lift and Ramp Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing decking systems in vehicles lack the ability to efficiently adjust compartment sizes and convert into ramps, limiting cargo handling efficiency and storage capacity.

Innovation Solution

An adjustable deck system with vertically movable decks and actuators, such as chain drives, that can form ramps and alter compartment configurations, including solenoid locking mechanisms for secure positioning, to enhance cargo handling and storage efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If fixed decking systems are used in cargo compartments, then structural stability is maintained, but cargo handling efficiency and storage capacity are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo handling efficiencyVSAvoidcompartment configuration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by transforming fixed decks into movable decks that can be adjusted to different positions and orientations. The decks are equipped with actuators that enable them to move between horizontal and ramped configurations, allowing the cargo compartment to adapt to different loading requirements and maximize productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality by designing decks that can serve multiple functions: acting as horizontal cargo platforms during storage and transforming into ramps for loading/unloading operations. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate fixed structures, enhancing both cargo handling efficiency and storage capacity within the same space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If manually operated decking systems are used, then device complexity is reduced, but labor intensity and safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeck adjustment easeVSAvoidactuator system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations with automated actuator systems. Electric or hydraulic actuators are integrated into the deck structure to automatically move decks between positions, eliminating the need for manual lifting and positioning while reducing labor intensity and improving safety despite the increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The deck system incorporates self-service features through automated actuators that independently position and lock decks without human intervention. The system includes sensors and control mechanisms that enable automatic detection of position and self-locking, reducing operational complexity over time through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If decks are made movable to increase adaptability, then cargo handling flexibility is improved, but structural stability and security are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompartment configurabilityVSAvoiddeck positioning stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically transitions between movable and fixed states. During operation, actuators move decks to required positions, and then locking mechanisms engage to secure decks in place, providing structural stability. This dynamic capability allows the system to maintain both adaptability during reconfiguration and reliability during cargo storage and transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Locking mechanisms and support structures act as intermediaries between the movable decks and the cargo compartment framework. These intermediaries ensure that when decks are positioned, they are securely held in place, maintaining structural stability and reliability while preserving the ability to move when needed for adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system allows for efficient loading and unloading of cargo by adjusting compartment sizes and forming ramps, reducing manual labor and increasing safety while maximizing cargo trailer capacity.

Implementation Method 1

an actuator that is mechanically coupled to the second deck, where operation of the actuator causes at least a portion of the second deck to move vertically relative to the first deck within the cargo compartment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChain drive: Chain

Implementation Method 2

including solenoid locking mechanisms for secure positioning

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolenoid: Solenoid

Data Source

PatentUS11904753B2Adjustable deck system for cargo compartment
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 ANCRA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATON
  • US11904753B2 patent drawing
  • US11904753B2 patent drawing
  • US11904753B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A deck system for cargo compartment may including one or more of the following features: a first deck; a second deck, where at least one of the first deck and the second deck divide the cargo compartment into an upper sub-compartment and a lower sub-compartment; and an actuator that is mechanically coupled to the second deck, where operation of the actuator causes at least a portion of the second deck to move vertically relative to the first deck within the cargo compartment.