Cargo Restraint Strip with Reinforcement Layer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cargo restraint systems for intermodal containers are inefficient, costly, and fail to securely hold loads during transportation, especially hazardous materials, due to limitations in strength, labor requirements, and compliance with regulations, leading to damage and reduced transport efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A flexible load restraining strip with a reinforcement layer of parallel filaments and adhesive layers, designed for easy application to container walls, providing enhanced shear strength and cost-effectiveness to secure cargo without leaving residues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional cargo restraint systems are used, then cargo can be secured, but the systems are inefficient, costly, and fail to securely hold loads during transportation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo securement effectivenessVSAvoidtransport efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The restraint system uses a composite structure combining wooden dunnage elements with metal binding straps and chains. This composite approach leverages the compressive strength of wood for load distribution and the tensile strength of metal components for active restraint, creating a more reliable securement system that prevents cargo shift while maintaining transport efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The restraint system is divided into functional segments: wooden dunnage for load distribution and cushioning, metal binding straps for circumferential restraint, and chains for diagonal securing. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function optimally, improving overall securement reliability without requiring a single complex device

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If conventional restraint systems are used, then cargo can be secured, but labor requirements are excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo securement effectivenessVSAvoidlabor time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Wooden dunnage elements are pre-positioned against the cargo before the container is closed, creating a preliminary restraint structure that distributes load and prevents initial movement. This preliminary action reduces the complexity and time required for final securement operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The wooden dunnage structure is designed to automatically distribute cargo weight and prevent shift without requiring continuous active restraint. The system serves itself by using the cargo's own weight against the dunnage to maintain securement, reducing the need for additional labor-intensive adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If conventional restraint systems are used, then cargo can be secured, but compliance with regulations is difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The restraint system separates compliance functions into distinct components: wooden dunnage for load distribution and impact absorption, metal straps for circumferential binding, and chains for diagonal securing. This segmentation makes it easier to verify and document compliance with different regulatory requirements for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses standardized metal strap widths, chain link sizes, and wooden dunnage dimensions that can be selected based on specific regulatory requirements and cargo weights. This parameter-based approach allows the same basic system design to comply with different regulations by simply changing component specifications rather than redesigning the entire system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The flexible load restraining strip effectively minimizes cargo shifting and damage during transport, enhances securement efficiency, and complies with regulations, while being labor-efficient and cost-effective, ensuring secure and efficient cargo transport.

Implementation Method 1

A first layer of adhesive coextensively extends along and coats the second side surface of the first cover layer of material of the flexible strip from the first end to the second end of the first cover layer of material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS8408852B1Cargo restraint system with enhanced reinforcement content
Publication Date: 2013.04.02 MBULL HOLDINGS LLC
  • US8408852B1 patent drawing
  • US8408852B1 patent drawing
  • US8408852B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cargo restraint system with enhanced filament characteristics wherein the restraint system includes load restraining strips with a layer of reinforcement material comprising a plurality of substantially parallel bundles of ends of filaments each filament comprises a plurality of one or more monofilament strands wherein the layer of reinforcement material has a break strength of between approximately three million two hundred forty three thousand one hundred and sixty nine grams and two million four hundred ninety four thousand seven hundred forty five grams.