Aircraft Cargo Restraint Indexing for Selective ULD Release

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cargo restraint systems for aircraft cargo bays lack efficient mechanisms for selectively restraining and releasing unit load devices (ULDs) during various phases of flight, such as taxi, takeoff, and landing, which can lead to cargo shifting and potential safety issues.

Innovation Solution

A cargo restraint system utilizing a driving shaft and interlocking gear mechanisms that rotate to switch between raised and lowered positions, allowing for secure engagement and disengagement of restraints to restrain or release cargo, ensuring stability and safety during flight phases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a cargo restraint system uses traditional restraint mechanisms that move in and out of pockets during loading and unloading, then the restraint can provide vertical, longitudinal, and lateral restraint, but the system lacks selective restraining and releasing capability for different ULDs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselective restraining and releasing capabilityVSAvoidrestraint mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The restraint system is divided into multiple independent restraint mechanisms (first restraint mechanism, second restraint mechanism, etc.), each capable of being selectively engaged or disengaged. This segmentation allows different ULDs to be restrained independently, providing selective restraining capability while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The restraint mechanisms are designed to be dynamically adjustable between engaged and disengaged states through the indexing mechanism. The restraints can be selectively positioned to restrain specific ULDs while leaving others free, enabling versatile selective restraining and releasing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the restraint mechanism moves in and out of pockets during loading and unloading, then vertical restraint is provided, but the system lacks efficient mechanisms for selectively restraining and releasing ULDs during various phases of flight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo restraint reliabilityVSAvoidselective restraint operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

An indexing mechanism serves as an intermediary between the control system and the restraint mechanisms. This indexing mechanism efficiently transmits rotational motion to selectively engage or disengage specific restraint mechanisms, improving operational efficiency while ensuring reliable cargo restraint through positive indexing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The restraint mechanisms are designed to automatically engage with ULD pockets when in the engaged position, providing self-service restraint without requiring additional manual intervention. The indexing mechanism automatically positions restraints into or out of engagement with ULDs, improving operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stability of the object's composition

If multiple restraints are used to provide comprehensive cargo restraint, then cargo stability is improved, but the complexity of the restraint system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo stabilityVSAvoidrestraint system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The restraint system is segmented into multiple independent restraint mechanisms that can be selectively activated. Each restraint mechanism provides comprehensive restraint (vertical, longitudinal, and lateral) when engaged, ensuring cargo stability, while the modular segmented design keeps overall system complexity manageable through standardized reusable components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each restraint mechanism is designed as a multi-functional component that can provide vertical, longitudinal, and lateral restraint capabilities through a single integrated mechanism. This universality allows comprehensive cargo restraint with reduced overall system complexity compared to using separate mechanisms for each restraint direction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12017794B2Systems and methods for restraining cargo on aircraft loading systems using indexing mechanisms
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 GOODRICH CORP
  • US12017794B2 patent drawing
  • US12017794B2 patent drawing
  • US12017794B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cargo restraint system includes a driving shaft, a first restraint, and a second restraint. The first restraint is operatively coupled to the driving shaft via a first indexing mechanism arrangement. The second restraint is operatively coupled to the driving shaft via a second indexing mechanism arrangement. The first and second indexing mechanism arrangements are arranged such that rotation of the driving shaft in a first rotational direction causes the first restraint to rotate between a lowered position and a raised position, and further rotation of the driving shaft in the same rotational direction causes the second restraint to rotate between the lowered position and the raised position. The first restraint may be axially offset from the second restraint to allow sequential loading and unloading of cargo.