Autonomous Cargo Handling Safety Assessment via Predictive Position Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous cargo handling systems in aircraft lack effective safety assessment methods to prevent collisions between cargo units, with the cargo and aircraft walls, and with human presence, leading to potential accidents.

Innovation Solution

A processor-controlled method and system that utilize sensing agents to generate a mapping of object positions, predict future states, and implement corrective actions by instructing the cargo handling system to slow or halt movement if safety protocols are violated, such as predicting overlaps between cargo units, aircraft walls, or humans.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autonomous cargo handling systems operate without safety assessment methods, then operational efficiency is improved, but collision risk between cargo units, aircraft walls, and human presence increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary safety assessments by predicting future states of cargo units before collisions occur. The processor calculates predicted positions based on current velocity and trajectory data, and implements corrective actions in advance to prevent collisions, thereby maintaining both operational efficiency and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors real-time positions of cargo units, aircraft walls, and human presence, feeds this data back to the processor, which then adjusts operational parameters dynamically. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to maintain high productivity while preventing collisions through real-time safety assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If real-time safety assessment is implemented, then collision prevention is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety assessment system is segmented into modular components: sensing agents for data collection, processor for prediction calculations, and control mechanisms for corrective actions. This segmentation allows the complex safety assessment function to be implemented through coordinated simple modules, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining collision prevention capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If predictive safety assessment is performed, then accident risk is reduced, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident risk reductionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial predictive assessment by calculating future positions only for cargo units with potential collision risk based on their current trajectory and velocity. Rather than assessing all cargo units equally, the system focuses computational resources on critical cases, reducing processing time while maintaining accident risk reduction for high-risk scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12060165B2Systems and methods for safely operating autonomous cargo handling systems
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 GOODRICH CORP
  • US12060165B2 patent drawing
  • US12060165B2 patent drawing
  • US12060165B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for performing a safety assessment of a cargo handling system controlled by a processor and having a plurality of sensing agents is disclosed. In various embodiments, the method includes receiving by the processor a run-time database from the plurality of sensing agents, the run-time database including data from which a positioning of a plurality of objects on the cargo handling system may be determined; generating by the processor a mapping of the positioning of the plurality of objects; validating by the processor whether a run-time state of the cargo handling system is in violation of a safety protocol; and determining by the processor whether to implement a corrective action.