Cargo Handling Vehicle Emergency Operation Mode Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cargo-handling vehicles like forklifts and bulldozers are vulnerable to theft, especially when left unattended, and existing theft prevention systems require password entry for operation, which can hinder emergency movements during events like earthquakes or fires.

Innovation Solution

A cargo-handling vehicle with a memory unit storing a second password for emergency operation, allowing restricted movement without the normal operating mode password, using a touch panel for password entry and providing a warning for restricted capabilities, and switching between password-necessary and unnecessary states based on risk levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a password entry system is implemented for theft prevention, then vehicle security is improved, but emergency response capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft preventionVSAvoidemergency movement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The operation mode is segmented into multiple distinct modes (normal mode requiring password, emergency mode accessible without password, and travel prohibited mode). This segmentation allows the system to provide different levels of access control based on the situation, resolving the contradiction by enabling emergency movement while maintaining theft prevention through the normal mode password requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between different operation modes based on the situation. The control unit can transition from normal mode (high security) to emergency mode (high accessibility) or travel prohibited mode (no movement allowed). This dynamic adaptability resolves the contradiction by adjusting the security level according to whether it's an emergency situation or a normal operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If password entry is required for all operations, then vehicle security is improved, but operator convenience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft preventionVSAvoidoperation convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments operations into those requiring password authentication (normal mode) and those that don't (emergency mode with restricted travel). This allows convenient emergency operations without password entry while maintaining security for full operational access, resolving the contradiction between security and convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different authentication requirements are applied to different operational contexts. The emergency mode provides local quality of ease-of-access for critical movements, while the normal mode maintains high security quality for comprehensive vehicle operations. This localized differentiation resolves the contradiction by matching security levels to operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If the vehicle allows free movement without password, then operational flexibility is improved, but theft risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement flexibilityVSAvoidtheft prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments movement capability into restricted emergency movement (without password) and full normal operation (with password). The emergency mode allows limited movement for urgent situations while the normal mode requires password authentication to prevent theft. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by providing movement flexibility only when necessary while maintaining theft prevention for unrestricted operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of travel restriction based on the operation mode. In emergency mode, travel is restricted to essential movements only. In normal mode, full travel capability is available but requires password authentication. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by adjusting movement freedom according to the security context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2196363B1Vehicle for cargo handling
Publication Date: 2013.09.11 NIPPON YUSOKI
  • EP2196363B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2196363B1 patent drawingFigure 2(A)~2(B)
  • EP2196363B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Limited operation of a vehicle for cargo handling, such as a forklift or a bulldozer, is allowed in the event of an emergency while theft of the vehicle is prevented even when the key is left in the vehicle. The vehicle is equipped with a storage unit for storing a password, a password input unit, a control unit for controlling selection of a normal operating mode with no restrictions on travel capability or cargo handling capability, an emergency operating mode where at least the travel capability of the vehicle is restricted, and a travel prohibited mode where neither the normal operating mode or the emergency operating mode is selected, and an emergency operating mode indicating unit. The control unit determines whether or not password entry is required when the vehicle is powered on and controls selection of the aforementioned normal operating mode when password entry is required or when a password entered and the password stored in the aforementioned memory unit match, the aforementioned emergency operating mode when emergency operation is indicated by the aforementioned emergency operating mode indicating unit, or the travel prohibited mode when neither the normal operating mode nor the emergency operating mode is selected within a predetermined specific amount of time or within a specific number of times of operation.