Carpet extractor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional carpet extractors often saturate surfaces with cleaning fluid, leading to inefficiencies in chemical processing and debris removal, as they deliver fluid directly to the surface without effective recovery systems.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates an open-top recovery tank with cam followers and a rotatable lid handle for easy access and efficient collection of spent cleaning fluid and dirt, featuring a fluid delivery system and a fluid recovery system that includes a nozzle assembly and brush roll for effective surface cleaning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If cleaning fluid is delivered directly to the surface to be cleaned, then the surface is saturated with cleaning fluid for chemical processing, but the efficiency of debris removal and chemical processing is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning fluid saturationVSAvoiddebris removal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning system is segmented into separate functional zones: a first cleaning zone that delivers cleaning fluid to the surface for chemical processing, and a second cleaning zone that removes the fluid and debris. This segmentation allows the surface to be treated with cleaning fluid in one zone while another zone simultaneously or subsequently removes the spent fluid and debris, resolving the contradiction between maintaining fluid saturation for chemical processing and achieving efficient debris removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If a fluid delivery system saturates the surface with cleaning fluid, then chemical processing is maximized, but the recovery and removal of spent fluid becomes less efficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning fluid applicationVSAvoidspent cleaning fluid recovery
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by delivering cleaning fluid to the surface in a first cleaning zone before the fluid becomes spent. The second cleaning zone is then positioned to remove the spent fluid and debris. This sequential arrangement ensures that cleaning fluid is applied and allowed to work on the surface, and then efficiently recovered in a subsequent zone, resolving the contradiction between maximizing chemical processing and efficient fluid recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the recovery tank is closed, then spent cleaning fluid is contained, but access for maintenance and emptying becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid containmentVSAvoidtank access
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The recovery tank incorporates a movable lid that can transition between closed and open positions. When closed, the lid contains spent cleaning fluid and debris. When opened, it provides easy access for emptying and maintenance. This dynamic design resolves the contradiction between maintaining fluid containment and ensuring easy operational access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Strength

If the lid is fixed to the recovery tank, then structural integrity is maintained, but ease of removal and installation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetank-lid connectionVSAvoidlid removal
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The connection between the lid and recovery tank is designed to be dynamic rather than fixed. The lid can be easily removed from and installed on the recovery tank through simple engagement and disengagement mechanisms, while maintaining structural integrity when connected. This resolves the contradiction between maintaining strong structural connection and enabling easy removal for maintenance and emptying.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the efficiency of cleaning fluid delivery and debris removal, allowing for better chemical processing and surface cleaning, while the modular design facilitates easy maintenance and storage.

Implementation Method 1

a vacuum source in fluid communication with the working air conduit to draw the cleaning fluid from the surface to be cleaned through the nozzle and the working air conduit to the recovery tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum suction: Suction

Implementation Method 2

the handle cam surfaces are configured and adapted to interface with the recovery tank cam followers releasably lock the lid to the recovery tank when the handle is in the closed position and to release the lid from the recovery tank and to raise the lid slightly from the recovery tank when the handle is in the open position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Data Source

PatentUS12053131B2Carpet extractor
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 BISSELL INC
  • US12053131B2 patent drawing
  • US12053131B2 patent drawing
  • US12053131B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A surface cleaning apparatus, such as a carpet extractor, includes a fluid recovery system for drawing dirty cleaning fluid from a surface to be cleaned. The fluid recovery system includes a recovery tank with a removable lid that has a handle that is pivotally mounted to the lid and is configured to releasably lock the lid to the tank and to assist in removing the lid from the tank.