Carrier Aggregation Configuration Using UE and Network Capability Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current network configurations for carrier aggregation are inefficient as they prioritize component carriers based on bandwidth without considering load, leading to overloading of some carriers and underutilization of others, resulting in reduced throughput and spectral efficiency for user equipment (UEs).

Innovation Solution

Determine carrier aggregation configurations for UEs based on their capabilities and the network's capabilities, using device data such as per call measurement data to identify make, model, and software combinations, and network data to optimize component carrier usage, thereby preventing overloading and improving spectral efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If component carriers are prioritized based on bandwidth, then available bandwidth is maximized, but carrier load distribution deteriorates causing overloading and underutilization

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebandwidthVSAvoidcarrier load distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the prioritization parameter from bandwidth alone to a composite metric that includes both bandwidth and load distribution characteristics. By evaluating component carriers on multiple parameters simultaneously, the system achieves balanced load distribution while maintaining adequate bandwidth availability across all carriers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic carrier prioritization where the selection of component carriers is continuously adjusted based on real-time network conditions and UE capabilities. This dynamic approach allows the system to optimize both bandwidth utilization and load distribution adaptively rather than relying on static bandwidth-based prioritization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If generalized network configurations are used, then configuration simplicity is maintained, but spectral efficiency deteriorates due to inefficient carrier usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration simplicityVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by tailoring carrier aggregation configurations to specific UE capabilities and network conditions rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach. Each UE receives customized configuration based on its supported frequency bands, carrier aggregation capabilities, and the current network state, thereby optimizing spectral efficiency for each local scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of UE capabilities and network conditions before configuring carrier aggregation. By pre-evaluating which component carriers are available, their bandwidths, and current loads, the system can proactively select optimal carrier combinations that maximize spectral efficiency before data transmission begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If per call measurement data is collected and analyzed, then carrier aggregation optimization is achieved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrier aggregation optimizationVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for carrier aggregation optimization from the per call measurement data. Rather than processing all available data, the system selectively extracts key parameters such as throughput measurements, latency values, and carrier utilization metrics that are directly relevant to optimizing carrier selection and configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where per call measurement data is continuously collected, analyzed, and used to adjust carrier aggregation configurations. The system processes measurement results to generate optimization recommendations that are fed back into the network configuration, creating a closed-loop system that continuously improves carrier aggregation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260082243A1Systems and methods for carrier aggregation combination using device data and network data
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US20260082243A1 patent drawing
  • US20260082243A1 patent drawing
  • US20260082243A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A carrier aggregation platform may obtain device data regarding first UEs associated with a geographical area and determine a data distribution of make and model combinations of the first UEs. The platform may analyze the data distribution to identify one or more make, model combinations that satisfy a threshold and determine carrier aggregation capabilities of UEs of the one or more make and model combinations. The platform may determine, based on the carrier aggregation capabilities, one or more combinations of frequency bands and a number of downlinks for the frequency bands. The platform may obtain network data indicating a carrier aggregation of a base station associated with the geographical area. The platform may determine carrier aggregation information based on the carrier aggregation , the one or more combinations of frequency bands, and the number of downlinks. Second UEs may be configured based on the carrier aggregation information.