Carrier Aggregation for Stationary User Equipment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In cellular wireless networks, mobility-limited UE devices experience low wireless data rates and inefficient battery usage due to unnecessary handover attempts when coverage areas overlap, as current methods prioritize handovers over carrier aggregation, which can increase bandwidth and data rates.

Innovation Solution

Implementing carrier aggregation for mobility-limited UE devices when they are substantially stationary, by determining their stationary status based on movement thresholds and air interface quality, allowing the base station to serve them on multiple carriers concurrently, thereby increasing bandwidth and reducing battery consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If handover monitoring is performed in overlapping coverage areas, then connection reliability is maintained for mobile UEs, but battery power is wasted and data rates remain low for stationary UEs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoidbattery power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts handover monitoring behavior based on UE mobility status. For stationary UEs, handover monitoring is suspended to conserve battery power, while mobile UEs continue normal handover procedures. The base station determines mobility status by evaluating whether the UE has moved beyond a threshold distance from its last known position, enabling adaptive power management that maintains reliability for mobile users while saving energy for stationary users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different handover monitoring strategies are applied to different UEs based on their local conditions. Stationary UEs receive differentiated treatment by suspending handover monitoring, while mobile UEs maintain standard monitoring. This local quality approach allows the network to optimize power consumption for each UE based on its specific mobility characteristics and service requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If carrier aggregation is deployed for all UEs, then bandwidth and data rates are maximized, but device complexity and network overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewireless data rateVSAvoidcarrier aggregation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Carrier aggregation is applied selectively rather than universally. The base station activates carrier aggregation only for stationary UEs that meet specific criteria, such as being in overlapping coverage areas and requiring enhanced data rates. This partial application of carrier aggregation maximizes productivity benefits while avoiding the complexity overhead for UEs that do not require or benefit from multi-carrier operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically activates or deactivates carrier aggregation based on real-time UE mobility status and network conditions. When a stationary UE is identified, carrier aggregation is activated to maximize data rates. When the UE becomes mobile or network conditions change, carrier aggregation is deactivated, reducing complexity. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize the trade-off between productivity and complexity on an ongoing basis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If handover is prioritized over carrier aggregation, then mobility support is ensured, but bandwidth utilization and data rates are reduced for stationary UEs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover execution speedVSAvoidbandwidth utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments UE handling into two distinct pathways: mobile UEs receive priority handover processing to ensure rapid connection transitions, while stationary UEs are routed to carrier aggregation processing to maximize bandwidth utilization. The base station evaluates UE mobility status and applies the appropriate strategy, allowing both handover speed and bandwidth utilization to be optimized for their respective target groups without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The priority between handover and carrier aggregation is dynamically determined based on UE mobility status. For mobile UEs, handover execution speed is prioritized to ensure seamless connectivity during movement. For stationary UEs, bandwidth utilization through carrier aggregation is prioritized. This dynamic prioritization mechanism allows the system to adapt resource allocation and processing focus based on real-time conditions, maximizing overall network productivity while maintaining mobility support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9565676B1Methods and systems for serving a mobility-limited user equipment device using carrier aggregation
Publication Date: 2017.02.07 SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC
  • US9565676B1 patent drawing
  • US9565676B1 patent drawing
  • US9565676B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for providing a mobility-limited user equipment device (UE) are disclosed. While a first base station serves a UE in a first coverage area on a first carrier, either the first base station or the UE makes a first determination that the UE is substantially stationary. Responsive to at least making the first determination, the first base station causes the UE to receive service on a second carrier concurrently with the first base station continuing to serve the UE in the first coverage area on the first carrier. By way of example, the first base station may provide the second carrier in the first coverage area, or a second base station may provide the second carrier in a second coverage area.