Discontinuous Carrier Grid With Pivoting Wheels for Flexible Sortation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current object processing systems, particularly in distribution centers, face inefficiencies and inflexibilities due to the need for a large number of collection bins, which increases physical space, capital, and operating costs. These systems struggle to efficiently sort and redistribute objects of varying sizes and weights.

Innovation Solution

An automated carrier system with discontinuous track sections and pivotable wheel assemblies allows for efficient movement of objects by changing direction without rotating the carrier, enabling flexible routing and reduced mechanical complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of collection bins are used to sort all objects to all destinations at once, then the sortation capacity and number of diverts increase, but the physical space requirements, capital costs, and operating costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesortation capacityVSAvoidphysical space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The sortation process is divided into multiple passes, with each pass handling a subset of destinations. Objects are sorted in stages rather than all at once, allowing the system to achieve high sortation capacity with a limited number of physical bins at any given time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically reconfigures bin assignments between passes. Collection bins are reassigned to different destination groups in subsequent passes, allowing the same physical bins to serve multiple destinations over time, thereby reducing the total number of bins needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If human workers manually sort objects to collection bins, then labor flexibility is maintained, but system throughput is limited by worker speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor flexibilityVSAvoidsystem throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses automated scanning and identification to determine object destinations, with objects being automatically directed to the correct bins. This reduces reliance on human decision-making speed while maintaining operational simplicity, thereby increasing throughput without sacrificing ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system can operate in multiple modes: fully automated sortation for high-throughput scenarios and manual sortation for situations requiring human judgment. This multi-functionality allows the system to adapt to different operational requirements while maintaining high productivity capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If recirculating conveyors with tilt trays are used for automated sortation, then throughput increases, but the system complexity and mechanical costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the diverting function from complex mechanical mechanisms and replaces it with simpler directional carriers that follow predetermined track paths. This eliminates the need for tilt trays and bomb-bay doors, reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining automated throughput capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Directional carriers serve as intermediaries between the conveyor system and collection bins. These carriers transport objects along tracks and automatically divert objects to appropriate bins using simple wheel pivoting, replacing complex tilt-tray mechanisms with a more straightforward intermediary carrier system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the carrier rotates to change direction, then the routing flexibility is achieved, but the mechanical complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting flexibilityVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The carrier's directional control is segmented into independent wheel assemblies rather than requiring rotation of the entire carrier body. Each wheel assembly can pivot independently to steer the carrier along different track sections, reducing the mechanical complexity associated with full carrier rotation while maintaining routing flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250187829A1Discontinuous grid system for use in systems and methods for processing objects including mobile matrix carrier systems
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 BERKSHIRE GREY OPERATING CO INC
  • US20250187829A1 patent drawing
  • US20250187829A1 patent drawing
  • US20250187829A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated carrier system is disclosed for moving objects to be processed. The automated carrier system includes a discontinuous plurality of track sections on which an automated carrier may be directed to move, and the automated carrier includes a base structure on which an object may be supported, and at least two wheels assemblies being pivotally supported on the base structure for pivoting movement from a first position to a second position to effect a change in direction of movement of the carrier.