Carrier Handling Conveyors With Leak Detection and Staging Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional AS/RS systems using articulated robotic arms for carrier handling are inefficient due to complex movements, limited versatility in handling various product types and sizes, and require specialized maintenance, increasing operational costs and downtime.

Innovation Solution

A carrier handling system (CHS) that performs case-to-carrier and carrier-to-case processes without articulated robotic arms, incorporating leak detection and utilizing conveyors, grip assemblies, and a controller to manage operations, allowing for faster handling and reduced maintenance needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If articulated robotic arms are used for carrier handling, then product loading and unloading can be automated, but the handling speed decreases due to complex precise movements required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of product loading and unloadingVSAvoidhandling speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the carrier handling process into separate functional modules: conveyors for carrier transport, grip assemblies for product engagement, and controllers for coordination. This segmentation allows each component to operate independently and efficiently, eliminating the complex coordinated movements required by articulated robotic arms while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The grip assemblies are designed with adjustable configurations that can handle various product types, sizes, and weights. The same grip assembly can be reconfigured for different products without requiring specialized robotic arms for each application, maintaining high handling speed across diverse product ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Extent of automation

If articulated robotic arms are used for carrier handling, then product loading and unloading can be performed, but the system becomes less versatile in handling various product types, sizes, and weights

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of carrier handlingVSAvoidability to handle various product types
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The grip assemblies incorporate adjustable mechanisms that can be reconfigured to accommodate different product types, sizes, and weights. The controller system manages these adjustments, allowing a single automated system to handle diverse products without requiring multiple specialized robotic arms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The grip assemblies feature dynamic, adjustable components that can change their configuration based on the product being handled. This dynamic adaptability allows the same hardware to optimize its grip for different product characteristics while maintaining automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Extent of automation

If articulated robotic arms are used for carrier handling, then automated product handling is achieved, but maintenance complexity and costs increase due to specialized designs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of carrier handlingVSAvoidmaintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the system into modular components (conveyors, grip assemblies, controllers), maintenance can be performed on individual modules rather than complex integrated robotic arms. Each module uses standardized components that are simpler to maintain and replace.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses simpler, more replaceable grip assemblies and conveyor components rather than expensive, highly specialized robotic arms. When wear or failure occurs, these simpler components can be quickly replaced with standard parts, reducing maintenance costs and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS20250376335A1Systems and methods for carrier handling
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 SAVOYE NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US20250376335A1 patent drawing
  • US20250376335A1 patent drawing
  • US20250376335A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method comprising method comprising receiving a first load disposed in a first carrier at a first position on a first conveyor, receiving a second load disposed in a second carrier at a second position on the first conveyor, receiving, from a sensor, sensor data indicative of a humidity level near the second position, determining, based on the sensor data, that a leak associated with the second load has occurred, responsive in part to determining that the leak has occurred, transferring the first load disposed in the first carrier to a staging area, and transporting, via a second conveyor, the second load away from the first conveyor while the second load remains disposed in the second carrier.