Workpiece-Carrier Loading Sequence for Mixed-Model Furniture Lines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current industrial plants for mass-producing assembled furniture face inefficiencies in preparing components, leading to high production costs and complex storage requirements, especially when producing products with various models, as manual preparation and large storage spaces are needed.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for in-line loading of workpieces, where components are subdivided into subsets and loaded onto a train of workpiece-carriers in a predefined sequence, using robots or manipulators to automate the process, allowing for efficient feeding of components onto a production line.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual preparation of bays is used, then workers can find and prepare necessary workpieces, but the preparation time becomes very long and production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual preparation flexibilityVSAvoidpreparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the preparation process by dividing workpieces into different bays organized by component type (e.g., panels, hardware). Each bay is automatically prepared with specific components needed for future production sequences, eliminating manual searching and preparation time while maintaining organizational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically preparing bays in advance with required workpieces before production needs them. The control unit pre-organizes components in each bay based on the production sequence, so when components are needed, they are already ready and waiting, eliminating preparation delays during actual production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If large storage spaces are provided for workpiece movement, then workers can access components, but storage space requirements increase and more workers are needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece accessibilityVSAvoidstorage space
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The storage system is segmented into multiple compact bays, each dedicated to specific component types. This segmentation allows efficient use of space by organizing workpieces vertically and categorically, reducing the overall footprint while maintaining easy access to all component types through the automated retrieval system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by using automated robots to retrieve and deliver workpieces from storage bays to the production line. This eliminates the need for workers to physically access and move workpieces through large storage areas, reducing both space requirements and labor needs while maintaining continuous component availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If many different workpieces are stored for finished products with many variations, then product diversity is achieved, but the number of workpieces in warehouse increases and bay preparation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct variation capabilityVSAvoidbay preparation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system handles product variations by segmenting workpieces into standardized component categories (panels, hardware, shelves) stored in separate bays. Each bay is organized by component type rather than by specific product model, allowing the same bay structure to serve multiple product variations. The control unit manages the complexity by tracking which components are needed for which products, simplifying the physical organization while maintaining product diversity capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If automated workpiece-carrier train system is implemented, then preparation time is reduced and production efficiency increases, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidloading system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The workpiece-carrier train system implements universality by using a single automated train that serves multiple functions: transporting workpieces between bays, delivering components to the production line, and returning empty carriers for reloading. This multi-functional system replaces multiple separate material handling systems, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high productivity and automation benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240359920A1Improved industrial plant and method
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 TECNOLOGICA SRL
  • US20240359920A1 patent drawing
  • US20240359920A1 patent drawing
  • US20240359920A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved industrial plant and method is described, in particular a unit or apparatus for loading workpieces on a line and a method for loading workpieces on a line with a sequence. Movable workpiece-carriers arrive sequentially at sets of components and are loaded one after the other with components to form the desired sequence.