Carrier Phase Detector Weighting for Faster Loop Stabilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional carrier phase detectors exhibit high stabilization times and increased bit error rates due to high signal variance and hard transitions between decision boundaries, leading to poor carrier phase loop stabilization and reliability issues in receiver systems.

Innovation Solution

A carrier phase detector that weights received data symbols in boundary phase areas gradually, with a symmetric boundary phase area around a mid-phase, reducing amplitude dependency and providing smooth transitions between nominal data symbols, using a weighting circuit to calculate a feedback signal based on the phase difference and boundary phase, and a multiplexer to switch between proportional and weighted feedback signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional DD carrier phase detector weights received data symbols linearly, then the feedback signal calculation is simple, but the signal variance is high and stabilization time is long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback signal calculation complexityVSAvoidcarrier phase loop stabilization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing a boundary phase parameter that creates different weighting behaviors in different phase regions. Received data symbols near boundary phases (within ±boundary phase of mid-phase) are weighted differently than those in nominal phase regions, with the weighting factor varying continuously based on the phase distance to the boundary. This local differentiation reduces signal variance at critical transition points while maintaining simplicity in nominal regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the weighting parameter from a fixed linear weight to a dynamic weight that depends on the phase position relative to boundary phases. The weighting factor is modified as a function of the phase difference between the received symbol and the boundary phase, creating a continuous transition region that smooths the feedback signal and reduces variance without significantly increasing computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If conventional DD carrier phase detector uses hard transition between decision boundaries, then the decision logic is simple, but the bit error rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision logic complexityVSAvoidbit error rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics into the decision process by making the weighting factor variable rather than fixed. The weighting applied to received data symbols changes dynamically based on their phase position relative to boundary phases, creating a smooth transition region that continuously adjusts the contribution of ambiguous symbols. This dynamic adaptation reduces bit errors at decision boundaries while maintaining clear decision logic in nominal regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies beforehand cushioning by pre-defining boundary phase regions where received symbols are naturally down-weighted before they can cause harmful transitions. This cushioning effect prevents the hard transitions and associated bit errors by reducing the influence of symbols in ambiguous phase regions, effectively protecting the decision process from boundary-related errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Power

If conventional DD carrier phase detector gives high weight to boundary phase symbols, then the feedback signal amplitude is high, but the variance increases and loop gain must be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback signal amplitudeVSAvoidstabilization time
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by not emphasizing boundary phase symbols but rather suppressing them through reduced weighting. Instead of giving high weight to all received symbols regardless of phase position, the invention applies low weight to symbols near boundary phases and full weight to symbols in nominal phase regions, thereby maintaining high effective signal amplitude while reducing variance from ambiguous symbols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS7529314B2Carrier phase detector
Publication Date: 2009.05.05 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US7529314B2 patent drawing
  • US7529314B2 patent drawing
  • US7529314B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Carrier phase detector for calculation of a feedback signal (D) for a carrier phase loop in a receiver,which loop detects a phase error (Δφ) between a phase (φin) of a received signal (Ein), which comprises a sequence of received data symbols, and a nominal phase (φnom) of a nominal data symbol (Enom),with the carrier phase detector in each case calculating the feedback signal (D) as a function of the real part and of the imaginary part of a received data symbol (Ein) ,with a received data symbol (Ein) whose phase is in a boundary phase area being weighted gradually to a lesser extent during the calculation of the feedback signal (D),with the boundary phase area in each case being arranged symmetrically with respect to a mid-phase (φmid) which is located in the centre between the two nominal phases (φnom) of equidistant nominal data symbols (Enom), and having a phase extent which is determined by a boundary phase (φg).