Information Processing for Cartesian Figure Scoring With Reference Figures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automatic scoring systems for problems requiring drawing of figures on a Cartesian coordinate system impose restrictions on the degree of freedom of drawing, leading to ineffective measurement of examinees' understanding and potential errors in setting scoring criteria.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that generates scoring criterion information based on user-drawn figures in a Cartesian coordinate system, allowing for the definition of scoring criteria through reference figures displayed on a display, enabling accurate and flexible scoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a restriction is imposed on the degree of freedom of drawing in answering, then automatic scoring with simple scoring criteria can be realized, but the effectiveness of measuring examinees' understandings of problems is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of scoring criteriaVSAvoideffectiveness of measuring examinees' understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of scoring criterion representation from numerical coordinate ranges to visual reference figure boundaries. This allows the scoring system to evaluate whether drawn figures intersect with reference figure boundaries, providing a more intuitive and flexible method that maintains automatic scoring simplicity while improving measurement effectiveness by allowing greater drawing freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the degree of freedom in answering is increased, then examinees' understandings can be measured more effectively, but conventional methods of specifying scoring criteria by user input of numerical values are error-prone and troublesome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of measuring examinees' understandingVSAvoidease of setting scoring criteria
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical input method of numerically specifying coordinate ranges with a visual display method where reference figures are shown on a display device. Users can visually identify and specify boundaries by interacting with displayed reference figures rather than manually inputting numerical coordinates, thereby eliminating input errors and simplifying the operation of setting scoring criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces reference figures as an intermediary between the scoring criteria definition and the evaluation process. These reference figures serve as visual mediators that translate complex numerical boundary specifications into intuitive graphical representations, making it easier for users to define and understand scoring criteria without dealing with error-prone numerical input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional methods of specifying scoring criteria by user input of numerical values are used, then scoring criteria can be set, but errors are likely to occur and the process is troublesome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of scoring criteriaVSAvoidaccuracy of scoring criterion setting
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual numerical input with visual display and interaction methods. Reference figures are displayed showing boundary lines, and users can specify scoring criteria by interacting with the visual representation rather than typing coordinates. This substitution eliminates transcription errors and improves reliability while maintaining flexibility in defining scoring criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12387618B2Information processing apparatus, storage medium and information processing method
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 CASIO COMPUTER CO LTD
  • US12387618B2 patent drawing
  • US12387618B2 patent drawing
  • US12387618B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes a processor that executes a program stored in a storage and generates scoring criterion information. The scoring criterion information is referenced in a scoring process of an answer figure to a problem that requires drawing of a figure in a Cartesian coordinate system. The Cartesian coordinate system is a coordinate plane or a coordinate space. In response to a reference figure being drawn in the Cartesian coordinate system based on a user operation, the scoring criterion information including information on a scoring criterion determined based on the reference figure is generated. The Cartesian coordinate system is displayed on a display.