Cartesian Machine Tool Qualification for In-Process Precision Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine tools have limited precision in measurements due to their reliance on a relative reference system, leading to geometric errors that are not detected during machining processes, requiring operator supervision and causing discontinuities in the workflow.

Innovation Solution

A work method for Cartesian machine tools that includes a qualification step to calibrate the relative positioning system against an absolute reference, allowing for electronic or active compensations to correct geometric errors, enabling precise measurements without operator supervision and integrating these corrections into the machining process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If measurement is carried out using the machine's relative reference system, then the measurement process is integrated into the machining workflow, but geometric errors in the machine are not detected and measurement precision is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow continuityVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary reference element (such as a laser interferometer or precision scale) that serves as a mediator between the machine's relative reference system and an absolute reference frame. This intermediary allows the machine to measure its own positional accuracy against an external absolute standard, thereby detecting geometric errors without disrupting the integrated measurement workflow. The intermediary reference element bridges the gap between relative machine coordinates and absolute spatial references.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If measurement probe is mounted on the working head using the same axes, then the measurement system is integrated into the machine structure, but any geometric errors in the machine axes are transferred to the measurement process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement system integrationVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the purely mechanical measurement approach (using the machine's own axes and transducers) with a hybrid system that incorporates non-mechanical or higher-precision reference systems. For example, optical interferometry or laser-based measurement systems are introduced to substitute for the mechanical axis-based measurement, thereby eliminating the transfer of mechanical geometric errors while maintaining system integration. The measurement probe may remain mechanically mounted, but the measurement principle shifts from mechanical displacement to optical field-based measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If traditional measurement methods are used, then the measurement process can be performed on the machine, but operator supervision is required and discontinuities are introduced in the workflow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement capabilityVSAvoidoperator supervision requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated feedback mechanisms where the measurement system continuously monitors machining processes and automatically adjusts or compensates for detected errors. The system compares measured dimensions against target specifications, and when deviations are detected, it either triggers automatic compensation through the machine's control system or alerts the operator only when necessary. This closed-loop feedback eliminates the need for continuous operator supervision while maintaining high measurement precision and workflow continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3367190B1Work method for a cartesian machine tool
Publication Date: 2022.10.05 HPT SINERGY SRL
  • EP3367190B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

A work method for a Cartesian machine tool, which comprises the following steps: - starting machining of a workpiece (15); - carrying out a machining cycle (16); - carrying out a qualification operation (18), i.e., an operation to check a relative positioning system, on board the machine tool, by way of comparison with a positioning system with absolute reference for calibration, which is adapted to check the displacement of the indications of the positioning systems on board the machine, i.e., of the relative reference system, with respect to the positions of an absolute reference system for calibration; - checking (19) the outcome of the qualification operation (18); - if the qualification operation (18) is passed successfully, then proceed with an operation to measure the workpiece prior to finishing (20); - if the qualification (18) is not passed, then proceed with a compensation step (21), which comprises one or more compensation operations.