Cas Gene Mutagenesis Using DGR Reverse Transcription Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for generating nucleic acid diversity in CRISPR-associated (Cas) genes are limited by low mutagenesis rates, inability to control mutation positions, and high risk of introducing nonsense mutations, particularly when performed in vivo.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a mutagenic reverse transcriptase from a Diversity Generating Retroelement (DGR) system, coupled with oligonucleotide recombineering, to introduce targeted mutations in Cas genes in vivo, allowing precise control over mutation positions and reducing nonsense mutations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If random mutagenesis is used to generate diversity in Cas genes, then a large number of variants can be produced, but the mutagenesis rate is low and many nonsense mutations are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of variantsVSAvoidnonsense mutation rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by using a targeted mutagenesis system that introduces mutations only at specific positions within the Cas gene coding sequence. The DGR system with its template region and variable region allows mutations to be confined to desired segments, avoiding random nonsense mutations while maintaining high diversity generation at functional positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter of mutagenesis control by using a defined template region with specific adenine positions that determine where mutations occur. By designing the template region with controlled adenine content and positioning, the system achieves predictable mutation rates and positions, eliminating the randomness and low efficiency of traditional mutagenesis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If in vivo mutagenesis is performed to enable continuous evolution, then both diversification and selection can happen in vivo, but control over mutation positions is lost and nonsense mutations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous evolution capabilityVSAvoidmutation position control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention maintains local quality control in the in vivo setting by using a plasmid-based DGR system where the template region is defined within the plasmid sequence. The variable region is targeted to specific positions in the Cas gene, ensuring that even during continuous in vivo evolution, mutations occur only at predetermined locations with controlled properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies preliminary action by pre-designing the template region with specific adenine positions and sequences before introducing it into the in vivo system. This preliminary design ensures that when the DGR system operates continuously in vivo, mutations are generated at the pre-planned positions with the desired characteristics, maintaining precision throughout the evolution process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional error-prone PCR is used for targeted mutagenesis, then mutations can be introduced in a controlled manner, but the process is cumbersome especially when many cycles of evolution are performed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetargeted mutagenesis controlVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies self-service by creating an autonomous in vivo DGR system that performs mutagenesis automatically within the cell. The system uses endogenous cellular machinery for transcription and translation, along with the introduced DGR components, to generate mutations without requiring repeated external PCR interventions. The system self-regulates the mutagenesis process through the defined template and variable regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical PCR-based mutagenesis system with a biological in vivo system. Instead of using thermal cycling and enzymatic reactions in a test tube, the mutagenesis is performed inside living cells using cellular transcription/translation machinery and the DGR system, simplifying the overall process for continuous evolution applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If DGR system is used to introduce controlled sequence diversity, then mutation positions can be controlled, but the system requires specific recognition sequences that limit applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemutation position controlVSAvoidapplication range
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention achieves universality by designing the DGR system to work with any Cas gene sequence. The template region can be designed to target any desired coding sequence, and the system does not require specific recognition sequences in the target gene. The modular plasmid-based design allows the same DGR machinery to be applied to different Cas genes and even other target genes, making the system broadly applicable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the generation of a large number of protein sequence variants in a targeted manner, with predictable mutagenesis and low nonsense mutation rates, suitable for directed evolution of Cas proteins and transferable to eukaryotic cells.

Implementation Method 1

a variable region within the genome will be overwritten by a DNA fragment produced from a near repeat template region in a process involving transcription, error-prone reverse transcription of the template and recombination

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReverse transcription:

Implementation Method 2

The error-prone reverse transcription ensures the introduction of genetic diversity at the variable region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectError-prone reverse transcription:

Implementation Method 3

recombining the mutagenized cDNA with the homologous DNA sequence of the Cas gene in the recombinant cell

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHomologous recombination:

Data Source

PatentUS20260043172A1Methods and systems for generating nucleic acid diversity in crispr-associated genes
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 INST PASTEUR
  • US20260043172A1 patent drawing
  • US20260043172A1 patent drawing
  • US20260043172A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are methods comprising expressing in a recombinant cell comprising a Cas gene a recombinant error-prone reverse transcriptase (RT) and a recombinant spacer RNA comprising a target sequence for mutagenesis of a DNA sequence in the Cas gene; making a mutagenized cDNA polynucleotide homologous to the DNA sequence in the recombinant cell; expressing a recombinant recombineering system in the recombinant cell; and recombining the mutagenized cDNA with the homologous DNA sequence of the Cas gene in the recombinant cell. Also provided are recombinant cells comprising recombinant coding sequences for a recombinant Cas protein, recombinant error-prone reverse transcriptase (RT), recombinant spacer RNA comprising the target sequence, and recombinant recombineering system.