Cascade Polymerization Reactor for Polyisobutylene Heat Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional cationic polymerization processes for polyisobutylene production face challenges such as limited control over molecular weight distribution, inefficient mixing, and heat transfer issues due to the morphology of tube and shell reactors, leading to suboptimal polymer quality and process efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A cascade polymerization process involving a homogenizing prepolymerization unit and a polymerization unit with a shared heat exchanger reactor system, utilizing a coolant loop and evaporative cooling to achieve precise temperature control and improved mixing, allowing for the production of polyisobutylene with a narrow molecular weight distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If tube and shell reactor morphology is used, then polymerization reaction can be conducted, but heat transfer efficiency is limited and cooling inhomogeneity occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoidheat transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is divided into multiple parallel channels instead of using a single tube and shell structure. This segmentation increases the heat transfer surface area to volume ratio and eliminates dead zones by ensuring uniform coolant distribution across all channels, thereby improving overall heat transfer efficiency and temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design transitions from a conventional tube and shell geometry to a multi-channel plate structure. This dimensional change creates additional heat transfer surfaces and improves the surface area to volume ratio, enabling more efficient heat removal and uniform temperature distribution throughout the reaction mixture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If tube and shell reactor is used, then polymerization can proceed, but preferential passages and dead zones are created

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymerization efficiencyVSAvoidmixing homogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is divided into multiple parallel channels with uniform coolant distribution. This segmentation eliminates preferential passages and dead zones by ensuring that the coolant flows evenly through all channels, creating uniform mixing conditions throughout the reaction mixture and improving polymerization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Area of stationary object

If multiple tubes are used in tube and shell reactor, then reaction surface area increases, but manufacturing complexity and maintenance difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer surface areaVSAvoidreactor structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple heat transfer surfaces are merged into a single integrated plate structure with parallel channels. This combining approach maintains the large heat transfer surface area needed for efficient cooling while simplifying the overall reactor structure, making it easier to manufacture and maintain compared to assembling multiple separate tubes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Stability of the object's composition

If recirculation rate is increased to improve mixing, then mixing efficiency improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing homogeneityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor design enables self-mixing through the inherent flow patterns in the parallel channels and the heat exchange process itself. The coolant flow and reaction mixture flow interact to create automatic mixing without requiring high recirculation rates, thereby achieving good mixing homogeneity while minimizing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process enhances control over the initiation and propagation stages of polymerization, improves mixing and heat transfer, and reduces preferential passages and dead zones, resulting in a more efficient and homogeneous polymerization process with a narrower molecular weight distribution.

Implementation Method 1

The heat of the polymerization reaction is removed from the recirculating intimately intermixed reaction admixture at a rate calculated to provide a substantially constant reaction temperature therein

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

utilizing a coolant loop and evaporative cooling to achieve precise temperature control

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentEP3481547B1Polymerisation process
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 INEOS EUROPE AG
  • EP3481547B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3481547B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP3481547B1 patent drawingFigure 1b

AI summary

The present invention relates to a cascade process useful for (fast) ionic polymerisation of liquid monomer(s) containing reaction mixture for the production of the corresponding polymer(s).