Cascaded Electrostatic Actuator for Extended Travel Range

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gap-closing MEMS actuators have limited travel range due to the inverse square law of electrostatic attraction, making them less versatile compared to comb actuators, which lack the actuation force of gap-closing actuators.

Innovation Solution

A cascaded electrostatic actuator design is implemented, where multiple parallel plates are stacked with alternating fingers or electrodes, allowing for increased travel by closing multiple gaps simultaneously under controlled voltage pulses, enhancing both travel range and actuation force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If gap-closing actuators are used to achieve high actuation force, then force is improved, but travel range deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation forceVSAvoidtravel range
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator is divided into multiple independent gap-closing units stacked in series, each capable of closing its own gap independently. This segmentation allows the system to achieve both high force (from individual gap closure) and extended travel (from cumulative closure of multiple gaps), resolving the contradiction between force and travel range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single-plane actuation mechanism to a three-dimensional stacked architecture. By arranging multiple gap-closing units vertically in series along the travel direction, the system achieves extended travel range through cumulative displacement while maintaining high actuation force from each individual gap closure event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Length of moving object

If comb actuators are used to achieve large travel range, then travel range is improved, but actuation force deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel rangeVSAvoidactuation force
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The comb actuator structure is segmented into multiple discrete gap-closing units, each contributing to the overall travel range while maintaining the high force characteristics of gap-closing mechanisms. This segmentation allows the system to achieve large cumulative travel without sacrificing actuation force, as each segment independently closes its gap with high force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the advantages of both gap-closing and comb actuator architectures by combining the high force mechanism of gap-closing actuators with the extended travel capability of comb actuators. The resulting hybrid structure achieves both large travel range and high actuation force simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Length of moving object

If multiple gaps are closed simultaneously to increase travel, then travel range is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel rangeVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically selects which gaps to close based on the desired travel distance, rather than closing all gaps simultaneously. This dynamic control approach allows the system to achieve variable travel ranges by activating only the necessary number of gap-closing units, reducing control complexity while maintaining extended travel capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator operates through periodic cycles of voltage application and release, where each cycle closes a specific subset of gaps. This periodic action pattern simplifies control by using repetitive voltage pulse sequences to achieve cumulative travel, rather than requiring complex simultaneous multi-gap control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design provides greater travel and force capabilities while maintaining controlled movement, suitable for applications like camera lenses and image stabilization, by leveraging the electrostatic attraction across multiple gaps, thus bridging the gap between the advantages of gap-closing and comb actuators.

Implementation Method 1

the electrostatic attractive force is inversely proportional to the square of the separation distance according to Coulomb's law. Thus as the gap separation is reduced towards zero, the electrostatic attractive force is markedly increased

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic attraction: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

the electrostatic attractive force is inversely proportional to the square of the separation distance according to Coulomb's law

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoulomb's law: Coulomb's Law

Data Source

PatentUS10476404B2Row and column actuator control
Publication Date: 2019.11.12 ADEIA IMAGING LLC
  • US10476404B2 patent drawing
  • US10476404B2 patent drawing
  • US10476404B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a device is provided that includes: a plurality of actuators arranged into a plurality of rows and a plurality of columns; a plurality of row conductors corresponding to the plurality of rows; a plurality of column conductors corresponding to the plurality of columns; and a controller configured to select at least one of the actuators in a row by raising a voltage on the corresponding row conductor to couple each selected actuator to its corresponding column conductor.