Cascaded Power Blocks for Modular Device Power Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The proliferation of small electrical devices in households and commercial settings leads to clutter and safety hazards due to individual power adapters and cabling, while each device requires minimal power, necessitating a more efficient and flexible power distribution solution.

Innovation Solution

A cascaded building block system comprising power blocks with integrated electrical generators and microcomputers that distribute power and messages to functional blocks, allowing for centralized control and dynamic power management through input and output coupling members, enabling flexible configuration and remote operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If individual power adapters and cabling are used for each electrical device, then each device can receive adequate power, but the living space becomes cluttered and hazardous

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower distribution convenienceVSAvoidcabling and adapter quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides power distribution into modular functional blocks that can be independently connected and configured. Each block handles specific devices or areas, segmenting the overall power distribution task to reduce clutter while maintaining adequate power delivery to each device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple power adapter functions are merged into a single centralized power distribution system. The system combines power generation, message transmission, and device control into integrated functional blocks, eliminating the need for multiple separate adapters and cables throughout the space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Device complexity

If a centralized power distribution system is implemented, then clutter is reduced and space is optimized, but the system complexity and control requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecabling and adapter quantityVSAvoidsystem configuration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic configuration capabilities where functional blocks can be added, removed, or repositioned based on changing power needs. The message transmission mechanism enables real-time adaptation of power distribution to match evolving system requirements without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Each functional block is designed with universal interfaces and multiple functions, including power distribution, message transmission, and device control. This multi-functionality reduces the need for specialized components and simplifies system configuration while maintaining adaptability to various device requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If power is distributed to multiple devices simultaneously, then all devices can operate concurrently, but power management and control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice operation concurrencyVSAvoidpower management control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the central controller monitors power consumption and operational status of all connected devices. Based on this feedback, the controller dynamically adjusts power distribution and sends control messages to optimize device operation while simplifying overall power management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

A message transmission mechanism serves as an intermediary between the central power distribution system and individual devices. This intermediary layer handles control signals and status information, allowing concurrent device operation while centralizing control management and reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12142963B2Cascaded power and signal processing block systems and methods thereof
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 KATERLY IND CO LTD
  • US12142963B2 patent drawing
  • US12142963B2 patent drawing
  • US12142963B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One example embodiment relates to a cascaded building block system, comprising: (a) at least one power block comprising: (i) an electrical power generator that provides electrical power; (ii) a microcomputer that generates messages; and (iii) at least one output coupling member that outputs the electrical power and the messages; (b) at least one functional block releasably coupled to the power block or to an adjacent functional block, each functional block comprises: (i) at least one input coupling member and at least one output coupling member; (ii) a microcomputer that receives and interpret the messages sent by the power block; (iii) a power distribution module controllable by the microcomputer to distribute the electric power to the at least one output coupling member; and (iv) a peripheral module; wherein the power block controls and distributes the electrical power to each of the functional blocks via the messages sent by the power block.