Cascaded Recompression Closed Brayton Cycle Heat Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Recompression closed Brayton cycle systems are inefficient in extracting heat from open cycle heat sources due to high efficiency in recuperation, leaving significant energy untapped.

Innovation Solution

A cascaded recompression closed Brayton cycle system with separate flow paths at the high-temperature portion and retaining a single recompression flow path to each compressor, utilizing multiple turbines and recuperators to maximize heat extraction by preheating fluid streams before they enter the turbines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If high efficiency recuperation is used in recompression closed Brayton cycle systems, then system efficiency is improved, but heat extraction from open cycle heat sources becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidheat extraction from heat source
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single turbine flow path into multiple separate turbine flow paths (first turbine, second turbine, third turbine) operating at different temperature levels. Each turbine handles a specific temperature range, allowing the system to extract heat more effectively across the entire temperature spectrum while maintaining efficient recuperation in each segment. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by enabling both high system efficiency and complete heat extraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If single turbine flow path is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but heat extraction capability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow path configurationVSAvoidheat extraction from heat source
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the heat extraction process into multiple parallel flow paths, each with its own turbine and recuperator. The first turbine handles high temperature flow, the second turbine handles intermediate temperature flow, and the third turbine handles lower temperature flow. This segmentation enables comprehensive heat extraction while keeping each individual flow path relatively simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-dimensional (single flow path) approach to a multi-dimensional (multiple parallel flow paths) approach. By adding the dimension of parallel flow paths operating at different temperature levels, the system achieves complete heat extraction without proportionally increasing overall system complexity, as each parallel path can be designed and operated independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If heat source flow is reduced from 900°C to 700°C in single turbine system, then system operation is simplified, but significant energy remains untapped

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operationVSAvoidenergy extraction from heat source
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the temperature reduction process into multiple stages across three turbines. The first turbine reduces temperature from 900°C to an intermediate level, the second turbine further reduces it to another intermediate level, and the third turbine completes the reduction to the final temperature. This segmentation allows the system to extract energy progressively at manageable temperature drops in each stage while maintaining operational simplicity through standardized turbine designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary heating to the working fluid before it enters each turbine stage, ensuring optimal inlet conditions for each turbine. This preliminary action (heating) prepares the fluid for efficient energy extraction in each subsequent turbine stage, enabling complete energy utilization while maintaining smooth and simple system operation throughout the multi-stage process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the efficiency of heat extraction from the heat source, reducing costs and energy loss, while maintaining the efficiency benefits of recompression closed Brayton cycle technology.

Implementation Method 1

a first recuperator where the first turbine discharge stream transfers heat to the first turbine feed stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

a second recuperator where the second turbine discharge stream transfers heat to the second turbine feed stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS9856754B1Cascaded recompression closed brayton cycle system
Publication Date: 2018.01.02 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US9856754B1 patent drawing
  • US9856754B1 patent drawing
  • US9856754B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to a cascaded recompression closed Brayton cycle (CRCBC) system and method of operation thereof, where the CRCBC system includes a compressor for compressing the system fluid, a separator for generating fluid feed streams for each of the system's turbines, and separate segments of a heater that heat the fluid feed streams to different feed temperatures for the system's turbines. Fluid exiting each turbine is used to preheat the fluid to the turbine. In an embodiment, the amount of heat extracted is determined by operational costs.