Lever-Lock Release Assembly for Premature Recovery Parachute Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing release systems, particularly in aerial delivery, suffer from premature deployment of recovery parachutes leading to 'extraction by mains' events, causing excessive drag and potential damage to aircraft and crew, with limited ability to prevent such events.

Innovation Solution

The lever-lock release system, comprising a rigid base with rotatable levers and a mechanism that transitions from an unlocked to a locked state to control the deployment of recovery parachutes, reducing premature deployment and enhancing safety by allowing precise locking and unlocking processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a simple release system is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability is worsened due to premature deployment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelease system structureVSAvoiddeployment control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The release system employs dynamic levers that can transition between locked and unlocked states, allowing the system to adapt its configuration based on operational needs. The levers rotate between positions to either secure or release the deployment line, providing dynamic control rather than a static structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The levers act as intermediary elements between the deployment line and the release mechanism. They mediate the force transfer and provide a controlled interface that prevents premature deployment while enabling reliable release when activated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a locked state mechanism is added to prevent premature deployment, then the reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment controlVSAvoidrelease system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The release system is segmented into discrete levers (first lever, second lever) that can independently rotate and lock. Each lever functions as a separate controllable unit, allowing the locking mechanism to be achieved through simple rotational movement rather than a complex integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a complex locking mechanism that requires multiple components, the system inverts the approach by using simple rotatable levers that naturally lock through their geometry. The locking action is achieved by the levers' rotational position rather than through additional locking components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If the lever-lock release system is used, then the reliability is improved by preventing premature deployment, but the ease of operation is worsened due to the locking mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment controlVSAvoidrelease activation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The release system is designed to be self-activating through the application of force. When force is applied to the first lever, it automatically rotates and triggers the release sequence without requiring manual intervention or complex activation mechanisms. The system serves itself by converting applied force directly into the release action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Strength

If the levers are designed with hooks and apertures for secure locking, then the strength is improved, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking capabilityVSAvoidhook and aperture alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The levers feature asymmetric geometry with hooks and apertures designed in non-symmetric configurations. This asymmetry provides inherent mechanical advantage and secure locking capability while allowing for tolerance in manufacturing, as the asymmetric shapes naturally guide proper alignment during assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The lever-lock release system significantly reduces premature deployment of recovery parachutes, preventing 'extraction by mains' events, improving safety and performance by allowing precise control over the release mechanism, and providing improved ease of use and flexibility in component sizes and load-bearing capacity.

Implementation Method 1

a first lever coupled to the rigid base such that the first lever is rotatable with respect to the base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical rotation: Lever

Implementation Method 2

deploying the extraction parachute to generate a force to urge the platform to exit the aircraft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag: Drag

Implementation Method 3

transferring, via the lever-lock release system, a force to the deployment line of the recovery parachute to cause the recovery parachute to deploy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force transmission: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS11035155B2Lever-lock release systems and methods
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 FOX JR ROY L
  • US11035155B2 patent drawing
  • US11035155B2 patent drawing
  • US11035155B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lever-lock release system is configured to releasably couple two objects together, for example a parachute and a payload. The lever-lock release system may comprise a first lever and a second lever, each rotatably coupled to a rigid base. When activated, the levers cascadingly rotate to release a first object and a second object. With these systems and related methods, various failure modes may be eliminated, such as undesired premature deployment of recovery parachutes during aerial delivery.