Cascading Pressure Reactor for Solar Thermochemical Fuel Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solar thermochemical reactors face inefficiencies due to high thermal reduction temperatures and low thermal reduction pressures, leading to excessive energy requirements, aperture radiation losses, and component fatigue, limiting hydrogen or carbon monoxide yields and scalability.

Innovation Solution

The use of multiple thermal reduction chambers with a pressure differential, where pressure decreases in the direction of particle flow, allows for lower thermal reduction pressures through cascading pressure reduction, enhancing the reversible oxygen capacity and efficiency of the redox cycle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If high thermal reduction temperatures (1000-2000°C) are used to achieve complete oxide reduction, then the reversible oxygen capacity increases, but aperture radiation losses increase and component fatigue occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereversible oxygen capacityVSAvoidaperture radiation losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The thermal reduction process is divided into multiple stages occurring in sequence at different temperatures. The first stage operates at lower temperature (800-1500°C) to achieve partial reduction, then a second stage operates at higher temperature (1000-2000°C) to complete the reduction. This segmentation allows the system to achieve complete reduction while limiting the duration and extent of high-temperature exposure, thereby reducing radiation losses and thermal stress on components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If high thermal reduction temperatures are used to increase reversible oxygen capacity, then fuel production efficiency improves, but component fatigue and system reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel production efficiencyVSAvoidcomponent fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reduction cycle is segmented into two distinct temperature stages. The first stage at moderate temperature (800-1500°C) performs partial reduction with minimal thermal stress, and the second stage at high temperature (1000-2000°C) completes the reduction. This segmentation maintains high productivity by ensuring complete reduction while improving reliability by limiting the duration and intensity of high-temperature exposure, thereby reducing component fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Quantity of substance

If low thermal reduction pressure is used to increase reversible oxygen capacity, then hydrogen yield per cycle increases, but pumping work and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen yield per cycleVSAvoidpumping work
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure reduction process is segmented into two stages corresponding to the two temperature stages. During the first partial reduction stage, the system operates at a first pressure, and during the second complete reduction stage, the system operates at a lower second pressure. This segmentation allows the system to achieve low pressure (high hydrogen yield) only when necessary during the second stage, while maintaining higher pressure during the first stage to reduce pumping requirements, thereby optimizing the balance between hydrogen yield and pumping work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Device complexity

If conventional single-chamber reactors are used, then device complexity is low, but thermal efficiency and fuel production are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor structureVSAvoidfuel production
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is segmented into two functional chambers: a first chamber for partial reduction at moderate temperature and pressure, and a second chamber for complete reduction at high temperature and low pressure. This segmentation enables each chamber to be optimized for its specific function, achieving high fuel production efficiency while maintaining manageable device complexity through modular design. The multi-stage approach allows better thermal management and resource utilization compared to single-chamber reactors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves a significant decrease in required pumping work, reducing oxygen flow velocities and pressures, thereby increasing the solar-to-hydrogen efficiency and enabling more efficient fuel production with improved reactor design and operation.

Implementation Method 1

a thermal reduction zone to thermally reduce a plurality of reactive particles through direct heating by solar energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDirect heating by solar energy: Solar Energy

Implementation Method 2

thermally reduce a plurality of reactive particles through direct heating by solar energy thereby producing a plurality of reduced particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal reduction: Thermolysis

Implementation Method 3

two or more thermal reduction sub-zones operating at a corresponding two or more decreasing pressures, and the pressure decreases in the direction of particle flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9815042B1Cascading pressure reactor and method for solar-thermochemical reactions
Publication Date: 2017.11.14 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US9815042B1 patent drawing
  • US9815042B1 patent drawing
  • US9815042B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Reactors and methods for solar thermochemical reactions are disclosed. The reactors and methods include a cascade of reduction chambers at successively lower pressures that leads to over an order of magnitude pressure decrease compared to a single-chambered design. The resulting efficiency gains are substantial, and represent an important step toward practical and efficient solar fuel production on a large scale.