Case Database Management System with Quality Evaluation and Incentive Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing case database management systems lack methods to evaluate the usefulness of case images, fail to motivate providers to submit high-quality images, and do not effectively manage a mix of high and low-quality images, with insufficient text-based diagnostic information for users.

Innovation Solution

A case database management system that allows users to evaluate case information, assigns evaluation points based on user feedback, and uses these evaluations to maintain high-quality data by selectively deleting or modifying low-quality content, while also providing incentives for high-quality contributions through usage fee adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If case images are registered from multiple medical facilities into a shared database, then the quantity of case information increases, but the quality of case information deteriorates due to mixing high quality and low quality images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of case informationVSAvoidquality of case information
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements an evaluation mechanism where users provide feedback on case information quality through evaluation input screens. The evaluation information collection device gathers this feedback, and the case information evaluation device processes it to assign quality evaluations. This feedback loop enables the system to identify and manage low-quality images while maintaining the growing database quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the system transfers money automatically based on usage count, then the ease of operation improves, but the motivation for providers to submit high quality case images deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of money transfer operationVSAvoidquality of submitted case images
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the payment parameter from a flat rate based solely on usage count to a variable rate that incorporates quality evaluation scores. The accounting device calculates payment amounts by combining usage frequency with evaluation results, creating a differentiated payment structure that incentivizes high-quality submissions while maintaining automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the database contains wide range of mixes from high quality to low quality case images, then the adaptability increases, but the reliability of diagnostic support deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability of case information rangeVSAvoidreliability of diagnostic support
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments case information into different quality levels based on evaluation results. The management device categorizes images as high quality or low quality, and can selectively provide only high-quality images for diagnostic support while maintaining the overall diverse database for reference purposes. This segmentation ensures reliability in critical diagnostic functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Device complexity

If the system focuses information provision on image information only, then the device complexity decreases, but the usefulness of diagnostic information deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of information provision systemVSAvoidusefulness of diagnostic information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides multiple types of information through a unified platform. The case information retrieval device can deliver both image information and text-based diagnostic information (such as radiogram interpretation reports) simultaneously. This multi-functional approach maintains system simplicity while comprehensively addressing diagnostic needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8832114B2Case database management system and method
Publication Date: 2014.09.09 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US8832114B2 patent drawing
  • US8832114B2 patent drawing
  • US8832114B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A case database management system capable of maintaining high quality case information registered in a case DB. A user of the case database management system can not only refer to case information registered in the case DB by user terminals, but also evaluate the case information. The case DB server of the system collects evaluation information evaluated by the user for each case information item and assigns each case information item with an evaluation containing an evaluation point indicating usefulness of the case information. This enables the case database management system to register more highly evaluated (high quality) case information in the case DB and to provide the user with useful case information.