Case File Lifecycle Governance via Storage Tiering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large case management systems face complexity and cost challenges due to the growing volume of data, requiring efficient storage and access management across the lifecycle of case files, which existing technologies fail to address effectively.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a lifecycle governance system that classifies case files based on status, using primary and secondary storage to manage access speed and location, with automated status changes based on criteria such as access frequency, age, and data size, to optimize storage resources and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If all case files are stored in primary storage to ensure fast access, then access speed is improved, but storage cost and system complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess speedVSAvoidstorage system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the storage system into multiple tiers (primary storage, secondary storage, and archival storage) based on data access frequency and importance. Active case files are kept in primary storage for fast access, while inactive or archived files are moved to secondary and archival storage, resolving the contradiction between access speed and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different storage locations are assigned different quality characteristics based on local needs. Frequently accessed case files receive high-quality fast storage, while less accessed files are placed in lower-quality slower storage, optimizing the overall system performance while reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If all case files are retained in the system, then data availability is improved, but storage cost and management complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata availabilityVSAvoidinformation lifecycle management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes predetermined retention policies and lifecycle rules in advance. Case files automatically transition through defined stages (active, inactive, archived, disposed) based on pre-configured criteria such as age, access frequency, and business rules, eliminating the need for complex manual management while ensuring data availability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors case file access patterns and automatically adjusts storage location and retention status based on actual usage feedback. Files that become frequently accessed again can be automatically retrieved from archival storage, ensuring data availability while maintaining simplified management through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If high-performance storage systems are used for all case files, then system performance is improved, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidstorage cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the storage parameters (speed, capacity, cost) based on the lifecycle stage and access requirements of each case file. High-performance storage is allocated only to active case files that require fast access, while inactive files are moved to lower-performance, lower-cost storage, optimizing the balance between system performance and storage cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10289685B2Information lifecycle governance
Publication Date: 2019.05.14 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10289685B2 patent drawing
  • US10289685B2 patent drawing
  • US10289685B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A case manager for managing the lifecycle of case files is provided. This case manager may serve to identify the status of a case file from a case file management system, determine whether the identified status meets or exceeds an active status threshold, and when the determined status meets or exceeds and active status threshold, channel the case file to a high performance storage resource. In embodiments, when access frequency goes down for a case file, the status may be changed and the case file may be channeled to alternative less efficient storage. When no further access to a case file is anticipated, the case file may be purged.