Role-Based Caseload Platform for Compliance and Case Transparency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Case management systems in higher education and K-12 institutions face challenges in transparency, organization, and compliance with federal and state laws, particularly in investigations of sexual misconduct and other violations, leading to disorganized information access and communication difficulties among parties involved.

Innovation Solution

A centralized caseload management system providing a web-based platform for tracking, managing, and sharing case-related information, with customizable user interfaces and access levels, automated compliance with laws and policies, and real-time progress updates, allowing parties to control notification preferences and document sharing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If a centralized case management system is implemented, then transparency and organization of case information is improved, but system complexity and implementation difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecase information transparencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides case information into distinct modules including case details, documents, communications, deadlines, and party information. Each module can be independently managed and accessed, allowing comprehensive information transparency while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized platform serves multiple functions including case tracking, document management, communication facilitation, deadline monitoring, and role-based access control. This multi-functional approach consolidates various case management tasks into a single system, improving overall transparency without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If role-based access control is implemented for different parties, then information security and privacy is improved, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation securityVSAvoidsystem usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different access control levels to different users based on their roles (complainant, respondent, investigator, coordinator, advisor). Each role receives customized information and permissions appropriate to their specific needs, ensuring security while maintaining ease of operation through role-specific interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically assigns appropriate access levels and permissions based on user roles without requiring manual configuration. Users can access information and perform actions relevant to their role without needing to understand complex security protocols, maintaining both security and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If automated compliance tracking is implemented, then compliance accuracy with laws and policies is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-configures compliance requirements, deadlines, and procedural steps based on applicable laws and policies (such as Title IX). This preliminary setup enables automated tracking and ensures compliance accuracy without requiring complex real-time decision-making, as the compliance framework is established in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors case progress against compliance requirements and provides feedback on upcoming deadlines and required actions. This automated feedback mechanism ensures continuous compliance monitoring without manual intervention, maintaining high compliance accuracy while managing system complexity through rule-based automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If real-time communication and collaboration features are added, then communication efficiency among parties is improved, but system resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidsystem resource requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple communication functions including messaging, document sharing, notification systems, and collaboration tools into a single integrated platform. This consolidation improves communication efficiency by providing real-time access to all parties while managing resource requirements through unified architecture rather than multiple separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20260080364A1Case management systems and method
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 GRAND RIVER SOLUTIONS
  • US20260080364A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080364A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080364A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is an exemplary caseload management system, including a processor and a non-transitory computer-readable medium including computer executable instructions for configuring the processor to carry out a method including: providing an electronic user interface that allows system users to remotely access case information via a web-based content access user interface; implementing a system service including: a file management system, a calendaring system, a communications system, and a rules, policies and procedures system; maintaining a database of content accessed by the users via the web-based content access user interface; and extracting portions of the content from the database and providing the content to the users through the web-based content access user interface, in which providing the content to the users involves providing the content to at least six different types of users, and in which each of the different types of users is allowed access to different levels of information.