Casement Window Operator Linear Input Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing casement window operators with rotary input mechanisms, such as crank handles, require higher operational forces and do not offer secure braking options for intermediate positions, limiting user convenience and energy efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A casement window operator with a linear input mechanism, including a sliding handle and a gear reducer system, which converts linear motion into rotary motion to operate the sash arm, and an integrated brake mechanism to secure the window at various positions, reducing operational force and enhancing user control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a rotary input mechanism (crank handle) is used, then the window can be operated, but higher operational forces are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational forceVSAvoidmechanism type
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional rotary crank mechanism with a linear sliding mechanism that incorporates a rack and pinion system. The linear input mechanism converts straightforward sliding motion into rotational motion of the sash arm, reducing the operational force required compared to conventional rotary cranks while maintaining mechanical simplicity through the use of standard gear components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a dynamic brake mechanism that can engage at multiple positions along the linear track, allowing the window to be held securely at intermediate positions. This dynamic braking capability provides user convenience by enabling the window to be stopped and held at various points during operation, rather than requiring continuous motion or fixed-position locking only.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If a rotary input mechanism is used, then the window can be operated, but secure braking options for intermediate positions are not available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking capabilityVSAvoidbrake mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic brake mechanism that can engage at multiple positions along the linear track. The brake is actuated by the sliding mechanism itself and can provide secure holding positions at various points during window operation, enabling intermediate positioning without requiring a complex multi-component brake system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The brake mechanism is integrated into the linear sliding mechanism itself, combining the input mechanism and braking function into a unified system. The sliding action that operates the window also actuates the brake, eliminating the need for separate, independent brake components and reducing overall device complexity while providing secure intermediate positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Force

If a linear input mechanism is used, then operational force is reduced, but the mechanism requires precise motion conversion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational forceVSAvoidmotion conversion accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a rack and pinion mechanism to convert linear sliding motion into rotational motion of the sash arm. This standard mechanical conversion system provides reliable and accurate motion transformation, ensuring that the linear input is precisely translated into the required rotational output for window operation without requiring complex control systems or high-precision manufacturing beyond standard gear tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces the operational force required to open and close the window, allows secure braking at intermediate positions, and improves user convenience by enabling easy sliding motion with reduced contact, thus enhancing the overall efficiency and usability of the casement window system.

Implementation Method 1

a linear to rotary motion converter operably coupled to an output of the linear input mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLinear to rotary motion conversion: Rack and Pinion

Implementation Method 2

a gear reducer operably coupled to an output of the rotary motion converter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear reduction: Gear

Implementation Method 3

an actuatable brake providing at least one braking position in which the actuatable brake is configured to contact the track and restrict sliding motion of the track mount along the track

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction braking: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11982118B2Casement sliding operator
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 PELLA CORP
  • US11982118B2 patent drawing
  • US11982118B2 patent drawing
  • US11982118B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A casement window operator includes a linear input mechanism configured to be mounted to a stationary frame of a casement window, a linear to rotary motion converter operably coupled to an output of the linear input mechanism, a gear reducer operably coupled to an output of the rotary motion converter, and a sash arm operably coupled to an output of the gear reducer to rotate in conjunction with the output of the gear reducer. The sash arm is configured to extend from the stationary frame of the casement window to a rotatable window sash of the casement window.