Casing Manufacturing via Plate Frame Adhesion and Thermal Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The conventional milling process for manufacturing notebook computer casings is inefficient, requiring numerous machines, resulting in slower processing speeds, lower yields, and limited feasibility for mass production.

Innovation Solution

A composite manufacturing method involving adhesion and thermal fusion of a plate, frame, and main shell, where the plate has adhering and thermal fusion regions, allowing for the assembly of a casing with enhanced structural strength without the need for processing a single metal workpiece.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a single metal workpiece is processed by milling to manufacture casing, then the casing has good structural strength, but the processing speed is slow and the yield is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The casing is divided into multiple components (plate, frame, main shell) that are manufactured separately and then assembled together. This segmentation allows each component to be produced independently using optimized processes, significantly improving overall productivity while maintaining structural integrity through the assembly of these components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite construction by assembling different metal components (plate, frame, main shell) into a unified casing structure. This composite approach enables each component to be manufactured using the most suitable process for its specific requirements, achieving both high productivity and structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If a single metal workpiece is processed by milling to manufacture casing, then the casing has good structural strength, but the manufacturing complexity increases due to requiring huge number of processing machines

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidnumber of processing machines
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the casing into separate components (plate, frame, main shell), the manufacturing process is distributed across fewer, more specialized machines. Each component can be produced using dedicated equipment, reducing the total number of processing machines required compared to milling the entire casing from a single workpiece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different components of the casing are manufactured using different processes optimized for their specific local requirements. The plate uses stamping, the frame uses casting or stamping, and the main shell uses die-casting or stamping, allowing each region to be produced with the most appropriate method rather than using a single complex milling process throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If a single metal workpiece is processed by milling to manufacture casing, then the casing has good structural strength, but the feasibility of mass production is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidfeasibility of mass production
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Segmenting the casing into standardized components enables each part to be mass-produced using dedicated stamping, casting, or die-casting processes. These processes are inherently more suitable for mass production than milling, as they allow for rapid production cycles and easier automation, while the components are subsequently assembled to form the complete casing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the manufacturing parameters by transitioning from a subtractive milling process to a combination of formative processes (stamping, casting, die-casting). This parameter change enables mass production by utilizing processes that can rapidly produce multiple identical components with consistent quality, while maintaining the structural strength required for the casing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method improves processing speed and yield, reduces manufacturing costs, and facilitates mass production while maintaining a full metal appearance and structural integrity.

Implementation Method 1

the thermal fusion region is fixed to the frame by thermal fusion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal fusion: Melting

Implementation Method 2

The main shell is adhered to the adhering region of the plate and the second surface of the frame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS10154620B2Manufacturing method of casing
Publication Date: 2018.12.11 WISTRON CORP
  • US10154620B2 patent drawing
  • US10154620B2 patent drawing
  • US10154620B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A manufacturing method of a casing is provided. First, a plate, a frame and a main shell are provided, wherein the plate has an adhering region and at least one thermal fusion region, and the frame has a first surface and a second surface opposite to each other. Then, the plate is stacked on the first surface of the frame, wherein the thermal fusion region is overlapped with the frame, and the adhering region is not overlapped with the frame. The main shell is adhered to the adhering region of the plate and the second surface of the frame. The thermal fusion region is fixed to the frame by thermal fusion. In addition, a casing manufactured through the above-mentioned method is also provided.