Cast Component Surface Structuring for Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cast components with planar surfaces in vehicles lead to detrimental acoustic effects due to sound wave conduction and are not cost-efficient or lightweight, while maintaining stiffness and acoustic properties is a challenge.

Innovation Solution

A cast component with surface structuring featuring evenly spaced depressions and interconnected webs, creating tapered sections that prevent oscillation membranes and reduce material usage, thereby enhancing stiffness and acoustic properties while minimizing weight and production costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a planar surface is used on cast components, then manufacturing is simple, but acoustic properties deteriorate due to oscillation membrane formation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidacoustic properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The planar surface is segmented into multiple regions by creating depressions and interconnected webs, transforming the continuous oscillation membrane into isolated sections. This segmentation prevents the formation of large-scale oscillation patterns while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through mold design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The surface is transformed from a flat planar geometry to a curved geometry with depressions and domes. The curved surfaces disrupt the oscillation membrane effect by eliminating flat areas, thereby improving acoustic properties while remaining compatible with casting processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Ease of manufacture

If uniform wall thickness is used, then manufacturing is simple, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasting process simplicityVSAvoidcomponent weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The wall thickness is varied locally rather than uniformly. Thinner walls are positioned in non-critical areas where structural demands are lower, while thicker walls remain in high-stress regions. This local differentiation reduces overall weight while maintaining structural integrity and compatibility with casting methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The wall thickness parameter is changed from a constant uniform value to a variable distribution across different regions of the component. This parameter variation enables weight reduction in areas where material can be removed without compromising structural requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Weight of moving object

If material quantity is reduced for weight savings, then weight decreases, but stiffness properties deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent weightVSAvoidstiffness properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Domes and curved surface features are introduced to redistribute stresses more efficiently throughout the structure. These geometric forms provide enhanced stiffness per unit mass compared to flat surfaces, allowing weight reduction while maintaining or improving stiffness properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The surface is divided into multiple segments by depressions and webs, creating a structured pattern that enhances stiffness. The segmented structure provides multiple load paths and prevents stress concentration, maintaining stiffness despite reduced material quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Object-affected harmful factors

If surface structuring with depressions is added, then acoustic properties improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic insulationVSAvoidsurface structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The surface is segmented into repeating patterns of depressions and webs that can be integrated into the mold design. While the surface geometry becomes more complex, the modular repeating nature of the pattern keeps manufacturing complexity manageable through standardized mold cavities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The surface structuring serves multiple functions simultaneously: it improves acoustic properties by disrupting oscillation membranes, provides stiffness enhancement through geometric reinforcement, and enables weight reduction through optimized material distribution. This multi-functionality justifies the increased surface complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10259411B2Weight-reducing surface structuring on components produced by a casting method
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US10259411B2 patent drawing
  • US10259411B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cast component, in particular for a vehicle, has a surface structuring arranged on at least one wall portion of the cast component. The surface structuring forms a surface of the wall portion, and stiffens the wall portion. The surface structuring is formed by a plurality of evenly shaped depressions in the surface of the wall portion, which depressions are mutually spaced apart, leaving interconnected webs, and produce tapered sections on the wall portion.