Cast Veneer Panel with Apertured Backing for Masonry Appearance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cast veneer wall panels are costly, complex to manufacture, and fail to resemble real brick or stone veneer effectively, with issues in durability, handling, and aesthetics.

Innovation Solution

A cast veneer wall panel design featuring a facing panel with simulated stone, brick, or tile elements and a backing panel with spaced apertures and concavities that key together, using reinforced materials like concrete and glass fibers, along with a mounting flange and registration marks for alignment, to enhance durability and appearance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If discrete thin bricks are manufactured and attached to a substrate, then a masonry appearance is achieved, but manufacturing cost and labor requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemasonry appearanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple discrete brick elements into a single monolithic cast panel, eliminating the need to manufacture and attach separate bricks to a substrate. The cast panel is formed as one integrated piece that includes both the backing panel and facing panel with design elements, thereby reducing manufacturing steps and labor requirements while maintaining the masonry appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cast panel is segmented into functional zones during the casting process, with recessed areas forming cavities that receive and secure discrete brick-like design elements. This segmentation allows the panel to be cast as a single piece while still accommodating separate decorative elements, resolving the contradiction between integration benefits and aesthetic requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If reinforced materials are used to improve durability, then resistance to handling damage increases, but weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidpanel weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies reinforcement locally only where structurally necessary - specifically in the backing panel areas requiring strength for handling and installation. The facing panel with design elements uses less reinforcement, optimizing the balance between durability and weight by concentrating material strength where it is most needed rather than uniformly throughout the entire panel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials combining concrete or cementitious base materials with fiber reinforcement (such as steel fibers or synthetic fibers). This composite approach provides enhanced strength and durability for handling and installation while maintaining a weight lower than solid reinforced concrete, as the fibers distribute stress efficiently throughout the matrix material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If a monolithic cast design is used, then handling durability improves, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling durabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates mounting features, cavities, and recesses into the panel during the initial casting process rather than adding them later. The backing panel is cast with pre-formed cavities that will receive design elements, and mounting flanges are integrated into the cast structure. This preliminary formation of attachment features simplifies subsequent assembly steps and reduces manufacturing complexity despite the monolithic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Shape

If discrete design elements are attached to a substrate, then masonry appearance is achieved, but labor requirements and installation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemasonry appearanceVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the backing panel and facing panel with design elements into a single pre-assembled monolithic unit during the casting process. The design elements are set in place within cavities formed in the backing panel before the concrete sets, creating a pre-assembled panel that requires minimal field installation labor. This eliminates the time-consuming step of attaching discrete bricks to substrates on the construction site.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS7997039B2Veneer panel
Publication Date: 2011.08.16 BORAL STONE PRODS
  • US7997039B2 patent drawing
  • US7997039B2 patent drawing
  • US7997039B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cast veneer wall panel includes a facing panel having at least one design element. The facing panel is made from a cast material. In addition the wall panel includes a backing panel including a series of spaced apertures. The series of spaced apertures receive a portion of the cast material in order to key the facing panel and the backing panel together.