Suction Pressure Casting Decompression Pattern Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In suction pressure casting, the conventional method struggles to real-time feedback-control the exhaust valve based on cavity pressure, leading to misruns or gas defects due to variations in core moisture and binder state, which differ by production lot and storage conditions.

Innovation Solution

A suction pressure casting method that measures cavity and core pressures during casting, calculates a corrected decompression pattern by comparing preset and actual patterns, and updates the decompression pattern for subsequent castings to align with the actual gas generation, thereby minimizing misruns and gas defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a preset decompression pattern is used to control the exhaust valve, then the casting process can be carried out with a simple control system, but the system cannot adapt to variations in core moisture and binder state, leading to misruns or gas defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to core variationsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by measuring the actual cavity pressure during casting, comparing it with the preset decompression pattern, and using the deviation information to correct the exhaust valve control for subsequent castings. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to core variations while maintaining a relatively simple control structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the decompression pattern parameters (exhaust valve opening amount and timing) based on measured pressure deviations from previous castings. By dynamically adjusting these parameters in response to actual casting conditions, the system adapts to variations in core moisture and binder state without requiring complex real-time control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If real-time feedback control of the exhaust valve is implemented, then the system can adapt to core variations, but the response delay of the exhaust valve prevents effective real-time control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time adaptabilityVSAvoidvalve response speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of the decompression pattern during each casting, then uses this measured data to pre-correct the exhaust valve control parameters for the next casting. This preliminary action approach allows the system to adapt to core variations without requiring fast real-time valve response during the actual pouring process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the measured pressure data from each casting to automatically adjust and improve its own control parameters for subsequent operations. This self-service mechanism enables continuous adaptation to core variations without external intervention, effectively compensating for the valve's response delay through iterative learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Speed

If the exhaust valve opening amount is adjusted using a vacuum tank and exhaust valve, then responsiveness is improved compared to exhaust pumps, but delay still occurs during short pouring times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexhaust responsivenessVSAvoidvalve operation delay
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback from pressure measurements to compensate for the valve response delay. By measuring the actual decompression pattern and comparing it with the ideal pattern, the system calculates correction amounts that account for the inherent delay, thereby improving the effective responsiveness of the exhaust control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If a preset decompression pattern is used, then the control is simple, but the difference between preset and ideal decompression patterns causes misruns or gas defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasting quality consistencyVSAvoidpattern correction mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by measuring the actual cavity pressure during casting, comparing it with the preset decompression pattern, and using the deviation information to correct the exhaust valve control for subsequent castings. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to core variations while maintaining a relatively simple control structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the decompression pattern parameters (exhaust valve opening amount and timing) based on measured pressure deviations from previous castings. By dynamically adjusting these parameters in response to actual casting conditions, the system adapts to variations in core moisture and binder state without requiring complex real-time control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces the difference between preset and ideal decompression patterns, preventing misruns and gas defects by dynamically adjusting the exhaust valve control based on measured core conditions, ensuring consistent casting quality.

Implementation Method 1

a suction-exhaust means (8) for suctioning and exhausting the inside of the cavity (5)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

a molten-metal pressurizing means (7) for supplying pressurizing gas into the holding furnace (3)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressurization: Pressurisation

Data Source

PatentEP3299097B1Suction pressure casting method
Publication Date: 2019.07.03 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • EP3299097B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3299097B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3299097B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A suction pressure casting method according to the present invention includes: with use of a casting device 1 that is provided with a holding furnace 3 in which molten metal 2 is accumulated, a metal mold 6 that forms a cavity 5 together with a core 4, a molten-metal pressurizing means 7 that supplies pressurizing gas, and a suction-exhaust means 8 that suctions and exhausts the inside of the cavity 5, a preset decompression pattern that is set in advance according to a casting process is compared with a measured pressure pattern of the cavity and the core that is measured during actual casting, a corrected decompression pattern is calculated based on the difference therebetween, and the preset decompression pattern at the time of the next casting is corrected by using the corrected decompression pattern; even if the amount of water in the core and the hardened state using a binder are different, the occurrence of a misrun or gas defect is suppressed.