Casting Design Optimization System for Shape Castings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current metal casting design processes rely heavily on human expertise and manual trial-and-error, leading to long development cycles and low reliability due to the lack of computational optimization techniques, resulting in suboptimal casting geometries and gating/riser systems.

Innovation Solution

A Casting Design Optimization System (CDOS) that includes a database of design data and rules, a graphical user interface, an inference engine for pattern matching and logical processes, and an optimization module to systematically optimize casting designs, ensuring high quality and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual trial-and-error iterations are used for casting design, then individual expertise and experience can be applied, but the development cycle becomes long and reliability is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasting design reliabilityVSAvoidcasting development cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical trial-and-error design iterations with an automated computational system. The system uses computer-based simulation software to model casting processes, allowing virtual testing of multiple design configurations without physical prototyping. This substitution of manual expertise with automated computational analysis directly reduces development time while maintaining or improving design reliability through systematic evaluation of multiple scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary computational analysis and simulation before physical casting production. By performing virtual modeling, heat transfer analysis, and fluid flow simulation in advance, the system identifies design issues and optimizes casting geometries before manufacturing begins. This preliminary digital action eliminates the need for time-consuming physical trial-and-error iterations, accelerating the development cycle while improving design reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If computational simulation software is used for casting processes, then heat transfer and fluid flow events can be predicted and visualized, but systematic optimization still requires human interaction and manual iterations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasting process prediction accuracyVSAvoidcasting design optimization automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service optimization system where the computational software automatically evaluates casting designs against predefined criteria and optimization algorithms. The system autonomously iterates through design parameters, adjusts gating systems and riser configurations, and selects optimal solutions without requiring continuous manual intervention. This automation of the optimization process maintains high prediction accuracy while significantly increasing the extent of automated design optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a multi-functional integration platform that combines computational simulation, automated optimization algorithms, and design parameter control into a single system. This universal system can handle various casting scenarios, material types, and geometry complexities through a unified interface, eliminating the need for separate manual analysis steps and increasing automation extent while maintaining comprehensive prediction capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional casting design processes are used, then individual experience drives design decisions, but there is no computational optimization technique involved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasting design easeVSAvoidcasting development productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces individual expert judgment with automated computational optimization algorithms. The system uses computer-based evaluation criteria and simulation tools to automatically determine optimal casting designs, eliminating reliance on individual experience while maintaining ease of use through automated decision-making. This substitution significantly improves productivity by rapidly evaluating multiple design options without human iteration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback-driven optimization system where computational results are automatically fed back into the design process. The system evaluates casting designs against performance criteria, provides automated recommendations for improvement, and iterates until optimal solutions are achieved. This automated feedback loop maintains ease of manufacture by presenting users with clear optimization guidance while dramatically increasing productivity through rapid iterative improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7761263B2Casting design optimization system (CDOS) for shape castings
Publication Date: 2010.07.20 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US7761263B2 patent drawing
  • US7761263B2 patent drawing
  • US7761263B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A casting design system (101) is provided which comprises (a) a database (115) which contains casting design data and rules, (b) a user interface (109), in communication with the database, which accepts as input a product design (103) that is to be cast by a casting process, and (c) an inference engine (111) which is adapted to generate casting designs (114) from the input product design by searching the database and retrieving data therefrom.