Low-Pressure Casting Control for In-Process Part Quality Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In low pressure casting, the quality of metal parts is typically determined after production, leading to time and resource wastage due to the need for quality testing and subsequent scrapping of substandard parts.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising sensors to detect process parameters in real-time, an intermediate control unit for data processing, and a main control unit for comparing these parameters against acceptable values to determine part quality during production, allowing for immediate identification and scrapping of parts not meeting quality standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If quality testing is performed after part production, then manufacturing completeness is ensured, but production time increases and substandard parts are identified too late

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart qualityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary quality assessment during the casting process by monitoring parameters such as temperature, pressure, and flow rate in real-time. The control unit compares these parameters against predetermined acceptable ranges before the casting process completes, enabling early identification of potential quality issues and allowing corrective actions to be taken before time and resources are fully consumed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by monitoring casting process parameters in real-time through sensors and comparing them against predetermined acceptable ranges. This feedback loop allows the control unit to immediately identify deviations from quality standards and trigger appropriate responses, transforming the traditional post-production quality check into a continuous during-process quality assurance mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If quality testing is performed after part production, then manufacturing completeness is ensured, but resource wastage increases due to scrapping substandard parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart qualityVSAvoidresource wastage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary quality assessment during the casting process by monitoring parameters such as temperature, pressure, and flow rate in real-time. The control unit compares these parameters against predetermined acceptable ranges before the casting process completes, enabling early identification of potential quality issues and allowing corrective actions to be taken before time and resources are fully consumed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the potentially harmful outcome of producing substandard parts into a benefit by using real-time parameter monitoring to predict quality issues before they manifest. This allows the process to be adjusted or stopped prematurely, transforming what would have been wasted resources into opportunities for process optimization and quality improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Loss of time

If real-time parameter monitoring is implemented, then part quality can be determined during production, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality determination timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit serves multiple functions: it monitors casting parameters in real-time, compares them against predetermined ranges, determines part quality, and can trigger alerts or corrective actions. This multi-functionality consolidates what could be multiple separate systems into a single integrated unit, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive quality monitoring capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the existing casting process parameters (temperature, pressure, flow rate) that are already being measured for process control, repurposing them for quality assessment. This self-service approach eliminates the need for separate quality measurement devices, reducing system complexity while enabling real-time quality determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the determination of part quality before completion, preventing unnecessary resource and time expenditure by allowing for the scrapping of substandard parts during the casting process.

Implementation Method 1

when low pressure air is sent into the chamber, the molten metal raw material in the chamber passes through the transmission line, with the effect of the pressure of the air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

The molten metal reaching the molding system is cooled and solidified to produce the desired part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentEP4104950A1A low pressure casting method and a system thereof
Publication Date: 2022.12.21 CEVHER JANT SANAYII AS
  • EP4104950A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4104950A1 patent drawing
  • EP4104950A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention discloses a low pressure casting method and a system thereof. Said system comprises at least one casting unit (1); at least two sensors (2), each for detecting at least one process parameter in the casting unit (1) during the casting process; at least one intermediate control unit (3) which is connected with the sensors (2) and the casting unit (1) for receiving the process parameters detected by the sensors (2) and controlling operation of the casting unit (1); at least one main control unit (4) for comparing the production parameters detected by the sensors (2) during the casting process with the acceptable maximum and minimum values in the bill of materials, so that quality of the produced part is determined. Said method comprises the steps of initiating the part production process in a casting unit (1); receiving at least two different process parameters by means of at least two sensors (2) during the part production in the casting unit (1); sending the received process parameters to at least one intermediate control unit (3); transmitting the process parameters, which have been sent to the intermediate control unit (3), to at least one main control unit (4); detecting quality of the produced part by comparing the process parameters in at least one bill of materials in the main control unit (4), which contains maximum and minimum acceptable values of at least two process parameters for the casting process, with the process parameters transmitted from the intermediate control unit (3).