Castor Backstop Wheel Bidirectional Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing non-return rollers either fail to prevent movement in one direction or have complex designs that are difficult to assemble and costly, while also being challenging to use effectively.

Innovation Solution

A simple non-return wheel design featuring a hollow cylinder sector housing with angled end walls and a protrusion that allows the wheel to pivot between two positions, enabling easy blocking in either direction of rotation, facilitated by a spring mechanism to maintain the desired position and gentle friction for operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a complex roulette wheel structure is used to lock the wheel in both directions, then the wheel can be locked in either direction of rotation, but the device complexity increases and manufacturing cost rises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel locking capabilityVSAvoidroulette wheel structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The roulette wheel is divided into two independent anti-return elements, each capable of preventing rotation in one direction. This segmentation allows the wheel to achieve bidirectional locking functionality through simpler, modular components rather than a single complex mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each anti-return element serves multiple functions: it prevents rotation in one direction, allows rotation in the other direction, and can be positioned at different angular orientations to provide locking capability in either rotational direction. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate mechanisms for each locking direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a complex roulette wheel structure is used to lock the wheel in both directions, then the wheel can be locked in either direction of rotation, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel locking capabilityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the locking function into two independent anti-return elements, each element can be manufactured as a simpler, more standardized component. This reduces manufacturing complexity and cost compared to producing a single complex bidirectional locking mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The anti-return elements are designed as simple, inexpensive components that can be easily manufactured and replaced if needed. Their simple geometry and function allow for cost-effective production through standard manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If a complex roulette wheel structure is used to lock the wheel in both directions, then the wheel can be locked in either direction of rotation, but the ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel locking capabilityVSAvoidwheel operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The anti-return elements automatically engage and disengage based on the wheel's rotation direction without requiring user intervention. The spring mechanism provides automatic resetting, allowing the wheel to be locked in either direction simply by rotating it, without needing to manipulate locks or switches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If a single anti-return element is used, then the structure remains simple, but the wheel can only be prevented from rotating in one direction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroulette wheel structureVSAvoidbidirectional locking capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Two anti-return elements are positioned at asymmetric angular orientations relative to each other. This asymmetric arrangement ensures that one element prevents rotation in one direction while the other element prevents rotation in the opposite direction, achieving bidirectional locking through simple geometric positioning rather than complex mechanics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The wheel effectively prevents movement in one direction while allowing movement in the other, with a straightforward assembly and reduced cost, enhancing usability and operational reliability.

Implementation Method 1

a spring (70) acting on the shaft (22) and tending to bring the shaft to this initial position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

gentle friction for operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3831616B1Castor with backstop
Publication Date: 2022.08.24 TENTE ROULETTES POLYMERES BRUANDET
  • EP3831616B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3831616B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3831616B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to an anti-return wheel comprising a housing (10) for fixing along an axis (11), a wheel (20) of radius Rr mounted on a shaft (22) of axis (23) and having a point of contact (24) with the ground, a housing (30) in the form of a cylindrical sector of axis (31), bordered by two walls (32, 33) and having an opening (34) defined on an angle Oac, a part (40) in the form of a cylindrical sector of radius Rp defined on an angle Pac and of an axial section complementary to that of the housing (30), an extension (50) made on the edge (41) of the part (40), the part (40) being mounted on the housing (10) to move in the housing (30) between two positions P1, P2.