Cat2 LBT Configuration for Wireless Interference Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing interference and optimizing resource allocation in shared wireless communication networks, particularly in unlicensed high-band frequency spectra.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of Category 2 (Cat2) and Category 4 (Cat4) Listen-Before-Transmit (LBT) operations, which involve specific configurations for LBT messages and channel occupancy times, to enable efficient wireless communication by determining the availability of the wireless medium through energy measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate hardware components are used for Cat2 and Cat4 LBT operations, then operational flexibility and reliability are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLBT operation reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a unified LBT component that can operate in both Cat2 and Cat4 modes through software configuration. The same hardware infrastructure (receivers, transmitters, processors) performs both LBT categories by executing different operational protocols, eliminating the need for separate dedicated hardware for each LBT type while maintaining full functionality and reliability of both modes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the previously separate Cat2 and Cat4 LBT hardware components into a single integrated LBT system. The unified component combines the functional capabilities of both LBT categories, allowing the system to dynamically switch between Cat2 (immediate transmission after short deferral) and Cat4 (contested access with random backoff) operations based on network conditions and configuration messages from the base station

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Device complexity

If simplified LBT operations are implemented, then device cost and complexity are reduced, but interference management capability may be worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic LBT operation selection where the system can adaptively switch between simplified Cat2 operations and more complex Cat4 operations based on real-time network conditions. The base station configures the UE to use Cat2 when the channel is clear and simple deferral suffices, and Cat4 when contested access and sophisticated interference management are required, thus maintaining low complexity when possible while ensuring adequate interference management when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the LBT system by introducing configurable LBT messages from the base station that dynamically adjust the LBT category (Cat2 or Cat4), deferral intervals, and transmission parameters. This allows the system to optimize between simplicity and interference management by adjusting operational parameters rather than hardware architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If Cat2 LBT operations are used, then transmission speed and efficiency are improved, but channel access reliability in congested networks deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoidchannel access reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic LBT category selection where the system transitions between Cat2 and Cat4 operations based on network congestion levels. When the channel is clear or lightly loaded, Cat2 provides fast access with minimal deferral. When congestion is detected through LBT message configurations from the base station, the system switches to Cat4 with extended deferral intervals and random backoff, maintaining reliable channel access despite increased network load

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances communication efficiency by reducing interference and optimizing resource usage, allowing for simplified LBT operations and potentially reducing device cost and complexity by using common components for Cat2 and Cat4 operations.

Implementation Method 1

performing a first measurement of a first duration during a first portion of a deferral interval associated with the LBT operation to determine a first energy value; performing a second measurement of a second duration during a second portion of the deferral interval to determine a second energy value

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy measurement: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS12324015B2Category 2 (CAT2) listen-before-transmit (LBT) operations for wireless communications
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12324015B2 patent drawing
  • US12324015B2 patent drawing
  • US12324015B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of wireless communication includes receiving, by a user equipment (UE) from a base station, a listen-before-talk (LBT) configuration message indicating whether category 2 (Cat2) LBT operations are enabled or disabled for the UE. The method further includes receiving, by the UE from the base station, a channel occupancy time (COT) message configuring the UE with a COT. The method further includes performing, by the UE, an LBT operation based on the LBT configuration message and based on the COT message.