E-procurement Catalog Optimization via Transaction Data Weighting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

E-procurement platforms face inefficiencies due to item saturation, where suppliers must balance offering a wide range of products to facilitate quick searches while avoiding unnecessary resource usage and ensuring highly specific items are readily available, leading to challenges in maintaining optimal digital catalogs.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that analyzes historical and expected e-marketplace data to determine the relative importance of items, generating recommendations for suppliers to optimize their digital catalogs by prioritizing items with higher weights based on transaction frequency and relevance, thereby reducing unnecessary resource usage and improving searchability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If suppliers saturate the e-marketplace with every item they offer, then item availability and search completeness improve, but server memory usage and buyer parsing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem availabilityVSAvoidnumber of items
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most important items from the complete supplier inventory and places them in the digital catalog. This selective extraction resolves the contradiction by making frequently searched items immediately available (improving reliability) while excluding less important items from the catalog (reducing quantity of items that buyers must parse through and server memory requirements).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different availability qualities to different items based on their importance. High-importance items are placed in the digital catalog with immediate searchability, while lower-importance items remain in the full inventory but are not prominently featured. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by optimizing availability for critical items without universally increasing catalog size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If suppliers restrict the number of items in digital catalogs, then search and query results are fulfilled more quickly, but highly specific items may not be available or noticeable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch fulfillment speedVSAvoidavailability of specific items
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback from transactional data and search logs to dynamically determine item importance weights. Items that are frequently searched or purchased receive higher weights and are more likely to be included in the catalog. This feedback mechanism ensures that the catalog contains exactly the items needed for quick search fulfillment while maintaining availability of specific items through continuous learning from buyer behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of item inclusion from a static binary decision to a dynamic weighted probability based on importance metrics. By adjusting the importance weight parameter for each item based on transactional data, the system optimizes catalog composition to achieve fast search fulfillment while preserving access to specific items through the weighted selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If suppliers maintain comprehensive item listings, then item availability improves, but resource consumption for maintaining and processing items increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem availabilityVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential subset of items needed for most procurement activities and places them in the optimized digital catalog. This extraction approach maintains reliability for common items while dramatically reducing the computational resources needed to maintain and process the full inventory, as the system only needs to actively manage the curated catalog items rather than all possible items.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by maintaining full item availability in the background system while only actively cataloging and optimizing the most important items. This partial approach ensures comprehensive availability when needed while reducing everyday resource consumption by focusing computational effort only on the critical subset of items that constitute the optimized catalog.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Ease of operation

If suppliers use detailed catalog groupings, then item discoverability and related purchases improve, but catalog complexity and maintenance difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem discoverabilityVSAvoidcatalog structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of transactional data and search patterns to pre-determine item importance weights and optimal catalog groupings before catalog generation. This preliminary action resolves the contradiction by establishing the catalog structure in advance based on data-driven insights, making items easily discoverable through pre-organized groupings while avoiding the complexity of manual, iterative catalog maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11587144B1Catalog enablement data for supplier systems based on community activities
Publication Date: 2023.02.21 COUPA SOFTWARE INC
  • US11587144B1 patent drawing
  • US11587144B1 patent drawing
  • US11587144B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for generating recommendation data for cataloging items in an e-procurement system is provided. In various embodiments, a database of records is created and maintained corresponding to a plurality of transactions in an e-procurement system. In various embodiments, database records are weighted and sorted according a transaction method associated with the records. In various embodiments, recommendation data is generated for items associated with the records to suggest more efficient methods for offering items for procurement in an e-marketplace based on the weights and sort order of the records.