Fuel Cell Catalyst Ink Production via Hydrophilic Pore Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fuel cells face performance degradation due to excessive hydrophilization of the carbon support, leading to flooding and reduced power generation, especially in varying humidity environments, as the surface state of the support is altered when hydrophilized before catalyst support, affecting ionomer coverage and proton diffusion.

Innovation Solution

A method for producing a catalyst ink by controlling the hydrophilic pores rate of the carbon support to 60% to 80% and dispersing an ionomer in the catalyst composite, using techniques such as acid treatment, firing, and ball milling to ensure appropriate ionomer coverage and proton conductivity across a wide range of humidity conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the surface of the carbon support is hydrophilized to improve catalyst support uniformity, then the catalyst distribution is improved, but flooding occurs in wet states and power generation performance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst distribution uniformityVSAvoidpower generation performance in wet state
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the hydrophilic pores rate within the range of 60-80% through acid treatment and firing processes. This optimized parameter range ensures sufficient catalyst dispersion while preventing excessive hydrophilization that would cause flooding, thereby resolving the contradiction between manufacturing precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by creating different hydrophilic characteristics in different regions of the carbon support pore structure. The hydrophilic pores rate control ensures that only specific portions of the pore structure become hydrophilic, providing localized catalyst support functionality while maintaining hydrophobic regions that prevent flooding, thus balancing catalyst distribution and power generation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the support is hydrophilized before catalyst support to improve surface state, then catalyst adhesion is enhanced, but the surface state changes when catalyst is supported and ionomer coverage becomes inappropriate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst adhesionVSAvoidionomer coverage uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing acid treatment and firing processes before catalyst support to pre-establish the optimal hydrophilic pores rate of 60-80%. This preliminary preparation ensures that the carbon support has the appropriate surface characteristics for both catalyst adhesion and subsequent ionomer coverage, preventing surface state changes that would compromise ionomer distribution uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the hydrophilic pores rate is increased to improve proton diffusion, then proton conductivity is enhanced, but flooding occurs and power generation performance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproton diffusion efficiencyVSAvoidflooding
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by optimizing the hydrophilic pores rate parameter within the specific range of 60-80%. This controlled parameter change ensures sufficient proton diffusion pathways while preventing excessive hydrophilization that would lead to flooding. The acid treatment and firing processes are carefully controlled to achieve this optimal parameter range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the power generation performance of fuel cells by maintaining optimal ionomer coverage and proton diffusion, reducing performance degradation across different humidity levels and loads, while preventing flooding and maintaining catalytic activity.

Implementation Method 1

acid treating the support in a range of from room temperature to 80° C. with a nitric acid solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcid treatment: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

firing the support in a temperature range of from 150° C. to 2600° C. in an oxygen-containing gas atmosphere

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiring: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 3

The ionomer may be dispersed in the catalyst composite with a ball mill in the dispersing step

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical dispersion: Ball

Implementation Method 4

firing the catalyst composite obtained by supporting the catalyst on the support, in a temperature range of from 150° C. to 500° C. in an inactive gas or reducing gas atmosphere

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiring in reducing atmosphere: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentUS10693144B2Method for producing catalyst ink, and catalyst composite
Publication Date: 2020.06.23 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US10693144B2 patent drawing
  • US10693144B2 patent drawing
  • US10693144B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for producing a catalyst ink, by which the surface of a catalyst can be appropriately covered with an ionomer, and the power generation performance of a fuel cell can be excellent in a wide range of humidity environments, and a catalyst composite. The method for producing a catalyst ink may comprise the steps of, for a catalyst composite in which a catalyst is supported on a carbon support with pores, controlling a hydrophilic pores rate of the carbon support to 60% to 80%, and dispersing an ionomer in the catalyst composite after the controlling step, wherein the hydrophilic pores rate is calculated by the following formula (1) using a contact porosimetry method:Hydrophilic pores rate (%)=(hydrophilic pores volume/total pores volume)×100.  Formula (1)