Catalysts and processes for the direct production of liquid fuels from carbon dioxide and hydrogen

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for converting CO2 and H2 into liquid fuels are inefficient and require multiple steps, often involving rare metals and requiring frequent catalyst re-activation, while also failing to meet quality and performance specifications for commercially viable production of 'drop-in' fuels.

Innovation Solution

A two-step catalytic process using a Nickel and Magnesium solid-solution catalyst for converting CO2 and H2 to syngas, followed by a second catalyst comprising cobalt, iron, magnesium, or other elements to produce synthetic liquid fuels, which operates efficiently in series at similar pressures and does not require frequent re-activation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional catalysts are used for CO2 to liquid fuel conversion, then the process requires multiple steps and frequent catalyst re-activation, but the invention achieves efficient conversion in two steps without frequent re-activation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel production efficiencyVSAvoidprocess steps and catalyst maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The catalytic conversion process is divided into two distinct steps using two different catalysts: Catalyst #1 (Fe-Ce-K2CO3) for CO2 to syngas conversion, and Catalyst #2 (Co-Ru-Ir) for syngas to liquid fuel conversion. This segmentation allows each catalyst to be optimized for its specific function, achieving high efficiency without requiring frequent re-activation or complex multi-step procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention optimizes catalyst composition parameters by incorporating specific metal ratios and support materials (K2CO3 for Catalyst #1, and Co-Ru-Ir for Catalyst #2). These parameter changes enable the catalysts to maintain stable activity and selectivity over extended periods, eliminating the need for frequent re-activation while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional catalysts are used, then rare metals are required, but the invention uses enhanced catalysts that are more economical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst costVSAvoidcatalyst performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs composite catalyst structures: Catalyst #1 combines Fe, Ce, and K2CO3 on a support, while Catalyst #2 uses Co, Ru, and Ir in specific ratios. These composite materials achieve high catalytic activity and stability without relying on large quantities of rare metals, making the process more economical while maintaining reliable performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

By optimizing the catalyst composition with appropriate metal ratios and support materials, the invention extends catalyst lifetime and reduces the need for expensive rare metals. The enhanced catalysts maintain performance over long periods, effectively replacing frequent replacements of cheaper catalysts with a more economical long-term solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional processes are used, then greenhouse gas emissions are high, but the invention reduces emissions by 50-130%

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegreenhouse gas emissionsVSAvoidfuel production efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts CO2, a harmful greenhouse gas, into valuable liquid fuels through catalytic conversion. By using the two-step process with optimized catalysts, CO2 is transformed into syngas and then into liquid fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 50-130% while maintaining high fuel production efficiency. This turns a waste product into a useful resource.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Manufacturing precision

If current conversion methods are used, then the process is inefficient and does not meet commercial standards, but the invention achieves efficient conversion meeting commercial fuel standards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel quality specificationVSAvoidconversion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality optimization by tailoring each catalyst's composition and structure to its specific function: Catalyst #1 is optimized for CO2 reforming with Fe-Ce-K2CO3, while Catalyst #2 is optimized for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis with Co-Ru-Ir. This localized optimization ensures high conversion efficiency and produces fuels meeting commercial standards with precise control over product distribution and quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process efficiently converts CO2 and H2 into high-density liquid fuels with reduced greenhouse gas emissions, meeting commercial fuel standards and maintaining productivity over long periods without the need for catalyst re-activation, thus offering a cost-effective and sustainable alternative to traditional fossil fuels.

Implementation Method 1

Catalyst #1 converts H2 and CO2 mixtures to syngas with an H2 to CO ratio of about 1.5-2.5

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

Catalyst #2 produces synthetic liquid fuels (and other products) directly from the syngas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

H2 and 02 are produced from water using electrolysis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrolysis: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 4

The tailgas (C1-C5 HC's, H2, CO and CO2) from the catalytic process is partially oxidized with O2 to produce additional syngas and heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS11498886B2Catalysts and processes for the direct production of liquid fuels from carbon dioxide and hydrogen
Publication Date: 2022.11.15 INFINIUM TECHNOLOGY LLC
  • US11498886B2 patent drawing
  • US11498886B2 patent drawing
  • US11498886B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention relates to two improved catalysts and associated processes that directly converts carbon dioxide and hydrogen to liquid fuels. The catalytic converter is comprised of two catalysts in series that are operated at the same pressures to directly produce synthetic liquid fuels or synthetic natural gas. The carbon conversion efficiency for CO2 to liquid fuels is greater than 45%. The fuel is distilled into a premium diesel fuels (approximately 70 volume %) and naphtha (approximately 30 volume %) which are used directly as “drop-in” fuels without requiring any further processing. Any light hydrocarbons that are present with the carbon dioxide are also converted directly to fuels. This process is directly applicable to the conversion of CO2 collected from ethanol plants, cement plants, power plants, biogas, carbon dioxide/hydrocarbon mixtures from secondary oil recovery, and other carbon dioxide/hydrocarbon streams. The catalyst system is durable, efficient and maintains a relatively constant level of fuel productivity over long periods of time without requiring re-activation or replacement.