Catalytic Process for Aromatic Aviation Fuel via Stream Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current processes for converting renewable feedstocks into aviation fuel and hydrocarbons are energy intensive and highly exothermic, leading to high hydrogen consumption, catalyst deactivation, and unwanted side reactions, making them costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A low-energy catalytic process that combines hot and cold streams of renewable feedstocks with metal sulfide catalysts under controlled conditions to reduce exothermicity and hydrogen consumption, utilizing in-situ generated energy to drive reactions and prevent side products, thereby enhancing catalyst life and product yield.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional hydroprocessing processes are used to convert renewable feedstocks into aviation fuel, then complete conversion of triglycerides can be achieved, but high exothermicity leads to high hydrogen consumption and catalyst deactivation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion completenessVSAvoidhydrogen consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The hydroprocessing reaction is divided into two sequential stages: first stage converts triglycerides to FAMEs and mono/diglycerides with controlled exothermicity, second stage completes conversion to hydrocarbons. This segmentation prevents runaway exothermic reactions and reduces hydrogen consumption by avoiding simultaneous occurrence of all reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first stage performs preliminary conversion of triglycerides to FAMEs before the second stage completes the conversion to hydrocarbons. This preliminary action controls the exothermic heat release in manageable steps, preventing catalyst deactivation and reducing overall hydrogen consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If high temperature and pressure are applied to achieve complete conversion, then product yield increases, but catalyst deactivation occurs due to unwanted side reactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct yieldVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The catalytic process is segmented into two stages with different catalysts optimized for each stage. Stage 1 uses a catalyst optimized for triglyceride conversion to FAMEs, while stage 2 uses a catalyst optimized for FAME conversion to hydrocarbons. This segmentation allows each catalyst to operate under optimal conditions without suffering from side reactions that would cause deactivation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different catalysts with specific properties are used in each reaction stage. The first catalyst has properties optimized for triglyceride hydrolysis/transesterification, while the second catalyst has properties optimized for FAME hydrodeoxygenation. This local quality optimization ensures high product yield while maintaining catalyst stability in each specific reaction environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Temperature

If additional quench gas is used to control reactor temperature, then temperature control is improved, but capital cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor temperature controlVSAvoidcapital cost
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process uses the exothermic heat generated in the first stage reaction to preheat the feedstock for the second stage reaction. This self-service approach to temperature control eliminates or reduces the need for additional quench gas and external heating systems, thereby reducing capital costs while maintaining proper temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The exothermic heat that would normally require quenching to control is instead utilized as a beneficial heat source to preheat the feed for the second reaction stage. This converts the harmful excessive heat into a useful resource, eliminating the need for quench gas and associated capital investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces hydrogen consumption, prevents catalyst deactivation, and increases the yield of desired hydrocarbons, including aromatics and kerosene, while maintaining stable reaction temperatures and reducing capital costs by eliminating the need for additional quench gas.

Implementation Method 1

A low-energy catalytic process that combines hot and cold streams of renewable feedstocks with metal sulfide catalysts under controlled conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

utilizing in-situ generated energy to drive reactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentUS10351782B2Process to produce aromatics rich aviation fuel along with other C1-C24 hydrocarbons
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 COUNCIL OF SCI & IND RES
  • US10351782B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A single step catalytic process for the preparation of aromatic rich aviation fuel from renewable resource in the presence of a hydrogen stream, and one or more hydroprocessing catalysts, under operating conditions for hydroconversion reactions, as defined herein, with mixed hot and cold streams of the renewable feed and getting desired product after separation of water, lighter hydrocarbon gases and carbon oxides, the said product comprising of hydrocarbons C6-C24, rich in aromatic content in the aviation fuel range, including kerosene range.