Catalytic Bed Arrangement for Kinetic Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for developing catalytic processes at a commercial scale are inefficient, requiring costly and time-consuming trial-and-error approaches, often resulting in suboptimal conditions that sacrifice catalyst lifespan and process efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A systematic method for arranging multiple catalyst beds in series based on their kinetic properties, specifically by ordering them according to decreasing characteristic reaction order, to maximize catalytic performance without significant capital investment or revenue loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If trial-and-error approach is used to test all possible combinations of catalyst and conditions, then maximum product yield is achieved, but development cost and time are excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct yieldVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by utilizing kinetic parameters (reaction order, activation energy, pre-exponential factor) to systematically determine optimal catalyst arrangement. Instead of trial-and-error testing, the method calculates the theoretical optimal configuration based on kinetic data, thereby reducing development time while ensuring maximum product yield through scientifically grounded parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If excessively severe reaction conditions are used to assure desired conversion rate, then product yield is achieved, but catalyst life-span decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion rateVSAvoidcatalyst life-span
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by arranging different catalysts in specific positions within the reactor based on their kinetic characteristics. Each catalyst bed is optimally positioned according to its reaction order and activation energy, creating a localized optimal environment for each catalyst type. This systematic arrangement achieves desired conversion rates without requiring excessively severe overall reaction conditions, thereby preserving catalyst life-span.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If additional process reactors are included to assure desired yield, then product yield is achieved, but process cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct yieldVSAvoidnumber of reactors
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies merging by combining multiple catalysts with different kinetic properties into a single optimized reactor system. Rather than using separate reactors for different catalysts, the method integrates them in a systematic arrangement within one reactor, achieving the desired product yield while reducing the total number of reactors and associated capital costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If processing rate is limited to assure desired yield, then product yield is achieved, but revenue decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct yieldVSAvoidrevenue
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating the optimal catalyst arrangement based on kinetic parameters before actual operation. This theoretical optimization ensures that the reactor operates at maximum efficiency from the start, achieving desired yield without needing to limit processing rate, thereby maintaining high revenue while ensuring product yield requirements are met.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for predictable and efficient catalytic conversion, exceeding the performance of using individual catalysts alone, by optimizing the arrangement of catalysts to achieve higher conversion rates and extend catalyst lifespan.

Implementation Method 1

the first catalyst and the second catalyst are each characterized by distinct kinetic parameters; the first catalyst being characterized by a first characteristic reaction order, a first characteristic pre-exponential factor and a first characteristic activation energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS10811121B2Configuring multiple catalytic beds
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 PHILLIPS 66 CO
  • US10811121B2 patent drawing
  • US10811121B2 patent drawing
  • US10811121B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates generally to methods and systems for achieving enhanced catalytic performance via the strategic arrangement of multiple catalyst beds in series, where each catalyst bed comprises a compositionally-distinct catalyst, and each catalyst facilitates the conversion of the same structural moieties on the reactant to form the same product. Arranging multiple catalyst beds according to the methods and systems disclosed herein allows a predictable enhancement of conversion of the reactant to product without the need for time-consuming experimentation to test all possible catalysts configurations.