Micro-channel Catalytic Hydrogen Separator for Fuel Cells

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing ultra-pure hydrogen gas are costly and inefficient, requiring multi-stage processes and significant infrastructure, making hydrogen fuel cells uneconomical for widespread use in traditional applications like automobiles due to high energy and equipment costs associated with hydrogen purification and storage.

Innovation Solution

A compact, integrated system that converts hydrocarbons into ultra-pure hydrogen through a single-step process involving steam reforming and a hydrogen separator, optimizing the water gas shift reaction to produce hydrogen on an as-needed basis for proton exchange membrane fuel cells, achieving high efficiency and reducing energy losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If multi-stage hydrogen production process is used, then ultra-pure hydrogen is achieved, but equipment cost and facility size increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen purityVSAvoidequipment and facility size
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple hydrogen production stages (reforming, water-gas shift, and purification) into a single integrated reactor system. The reforming catalyst and water-gas shift catalyst are positioned in sequence within the same reactor, eliminating the need for separate vessels and reducing overall system complexity while maintaining ultra-pure hydrogen output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single reactor is divided into distinct functional zones with different catalyst beds. The reforming section uses a first catalyst to break down hydrocarbons, followed by a water-gas shift section with a second catalyst to convert CO and water vapor into additional hydrogen and CO2. This segmentation allows each reaction to occur in its optimized environment within a compact unified structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If traditional hydrocarbon reforming process is used, then hydrogen is produced, but energy efficiency is low due to multiple processing stages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen productionVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous hydrogen production through a single-pass reforming and water-gas shift process. The reactor maintains steady-state operation where hydrocarbons are continuously converted to hydrogen without interruption, eliminating the energy losses associated with intermediate cooling, heating, and transfer between separate batch processors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The reactor operates under optimized temperature and pressure conditions that favor hydrogen production while minimizing energy input. The catalysts are selected and positioned to operate at specific temperature ranges that maximize conversion efficiency, and the system maintains these parameters continuously throughout the reaction zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If high-pressure storage is used, then hydrogen storage capacity is increased, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen storage capacityVSAvoidstorage system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel processor system is designed to produce hydrogen on-demand directly from hydrocarbon fuel storage, eliminating the need for separate high-pressure hydrogen storage tanks. The liquid hydrocarbon fuel serves as both the energy source and the hydrogen carrier, and the system converts it to hydrogen gas as needed through the integrated reforming and water-gas shift process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If secondary purification process is added, then hydrogen purity is improved, but processing time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen purityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor performs the water-gas shift reaction concurrently with the reforming process, rather than as a subsequent separate step. By positioning the water-gas shift catalyst downstream of the reforming catalyst within the same reactor, the system converts CO and water vapor to hydrogen and CO2 in-line, achieving ultra-pure hydrogen in a single continuous pass without requiring additional purification time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system efficiently converts hydrocarbon chemical energy into ultra-pure hydrogen, powering fuel cells with minimal energy loss and reducing costs by eliminating the need for secondary purification and high-pressure storage, enabling more economical and practical hydrogen fuel cell technology.

Implementation Method 1

a hydrogen separator that separates molecular hydrogen from a volume of mixed gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogen permeation through membrane: Permeation

Implementation Method 2

pass the gas through a conduit made of a hydrogen permeable material, such as palladium or a palladium alloy. As the contaminated hydrogen gas passes through the conduit, atomic hydrogen permeates through the walls of the conduit, thereby separating from the contaminants.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogen-selective membrane separation: Semipermeable Membrane

Implementation Method 3

A common hydrocarbon fuel is introduced into the heated reaction chamber along with water vapor. The hydrocarbon fuel and water undergo steam reforming where they react in a water gas shift reaction, producing less complex resultant gases.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSteam reforming: Chemical Transport Reactions

Implementation Method 4

The water gas shift reaction is optimized to maximize the concentration of hydrogen in the resultant gas stream.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWater gas shift reaction: Chemical Transport Reactions

Data Source

PatentUS7704485B1System and method for processing fuel for use by a fuel cell using a micro-channel catalytic hydrogen separator
Publication Date: 2010.04.27 ENTEGRIS GP INC
  • US7704485B1 patent drawing
  • US7704485B1 patent drawing
  • US7704485B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A power generation system and a fuel processor for use within a power generation system. A common hydrocarbon fuel is introduced into the heated reaction chamber along with water vapor. The hydrocarbon fuel and water react, producing less complex resultant gases. The resultant gases are passed into a hydrogen separator. The hydrogen separator separates hydrogen from the resultant gases. The separated hydrogen is used to power a fuel cell. The fuel cell produces electricity and water that can be recycled back into the system. A standard hydrocarbon fuel can therefore be used to power a fuel cell in a highly efficient, singe-step process.