Catalytic Reactor Temperature Control via Closed-Loop Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Catalytic partial oxidation (CPOx) of distillate fuels faces challenges in controlling operating temperatures to prevent coking and maintain selectivity, as existing methods struggle with non-uniform feed and high reactor temperatures, leading to short reactor run-times and material limitations.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop system is implemented to control reactor inputs and parameters, using a control algorithm that adjusts the fuel and air flow to maintain optimal operating temperatures within the catalytic reactor, employing a Microlith® substrate and catalyst technology, and varying the O/C ratio to prevent carbon formation while ensuring high selectivity of CO and H2 production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the reactor operates at high temperature to achieve high conversion, then productivity is improved, but the catalyst suffers from temperature excursions and coking, reducing reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion rateVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts operating parameters including temperature, pressure, and feed composition to maintain optimal conversion while preventing catalyst degradation. The controller modifies parameters in real-time based on sensor feedback to keep the reactor within safe operating boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

A closed-loop control system continuously monitors reactor temperature, conversion rate, and catalyst condition, then adjusts operating parameters accordingly. This feedback mechanism prevents temperature excursions and coking by detecting deviations from optimal conditions and correcting them automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the reactor runs for extended periods at maximum temperature, then productivity is improved, but the reactor materials reach their temperature limits, reducing reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverun-time durationVSAvoidmaterial integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic temperature control rather than static maximum temperature operation. The reactor temperature is continuously adjusted based on real-time conditions, allowing extended operation by preventing thermal accumulation and staying within material temperature limits while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system proactively prevents temperature from reaching material limit thresholds by detecting trends and adjusting parameters in advance. This cushioning approach maintains a safety margin below maximum material temperature limits, preventing degradation before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Device complexity

If the feed is not uniformly mixed, then device complexity is reduced, but temperature distribution becomes non-uniform, causing hot spots and coking, reducing reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing system complexityVSAvoidtemperature uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system addresses temperature non-uniformity by implementing localized control strategies. Different regions of the reactor are monitored and controlled independently, allowing the system to compensate for poor mixing by adjusting local conditions to prevent hot spots and coking without requiring complex mixing hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively extends reactor run-time, maintains temperatures below material limits, and reduces coke formation, achieving stable long-term operation and high selectivity of hydrogen and carbon monoxide products.

Implementation Method 1

Waterless catalytic partial oxidation (hereinafter referred to as 'CPOx') of liquid distillate fuels

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

A closed-loop system is implemented to control reactor inputs and parameters, using a control algorithm that adjusts the fuel and air flow to maintain optimal operating temperatures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFeedback control: Feedback

Implementation Method 3

The general reaction is shown below: CxHy+O2→mCO+nH2+small amounts of CO2 and H2O

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic oxidation reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentUS9102531B2Reactor control method
Publication Date: 2015.08.11 PRECISION COMBUSTION INC
  • US9102531B2 patent drawing
  • US9102531B2 patent drawing
  • US9102531B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for controlling the operating temperature of a catalytic reactor using a closed-loop system that provides for varying the reactor input and other operating parameters in order to maintain the operating temperature of the reactor at or near the initial setpoint temperature for operation of the reactor. In one example, maximum and minimum operating temperatures with a catalytic partial oxidation reactor are controlled, as well as maintaining control over the corresponding minimum required ratio of oxygen atoms to carbon atoms, such that the operating temperature within the reactor is maintained below the material limits but above threshold temperatures for coking.